Ablaut, Stress, Internal Derivation and Law of Accent Shift on the Right in the Indo-European Languages

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The article treats the mobility of Proto-Indo-European accent, its function and role in nominal derivation. Some researchers argue the existence of noun with several types of accent movement (accent-ablaut paradigms) and formulate the concept of internal derivation – i. e. the change of accent type of noun, transition in other class. Author means that there was one type of mobile accent in declension (unitary ablaut-accent-paradigm), and proposes a basic rule of derivation – the law of accent movement onto right: the position of accent is more right, the meaning of noun is more concrete.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

K. G. Krasukhin

Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Philological Faculty of the M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University; St. Tikhonʼs Orthodox University

Author for correspondence.
Email: krasukh@mail.ru

Doct. Sci. (Philol.), Leading Researcher at the Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor at the Philological Faculty of the M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Professor of the St. Tikhonʼs Orthodox University

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow; Moscow

References

  1. Соссюр Ф. де. Мемуар о первоначальной системе индоевропейского вокализма // Соссюр Ф. де. Труды по языкознанию. М., 1977. [Saussure, F. de. Memuar o pervonachalnoj sisteme indoevropejskogo vokalizma [A Memoir about the Original System of Indo-European Vocalism]. Saussure, F. de. Trudy po yazykoznaniyu [Works on Linguistics]. Moscow, 1977. (In Russ.)]
  2. van Wijk N. Der Indogermanische Nominativ in seiner besonderen Beziehung zum Genitiv. Zwölle, 1900. (In German)
  3. Lehmann W.P. On the earlier stage of Indo-European nominal flexion. Lingua, 1958.
  4. Pedersen H. La cinqième declinaison de latin. Copenhagen, 1926. (In French)
  5. Études lithuanniques, Copenhagen, 1933. (In French)
  6. Бенвенист Э. Индоевропейское именное словообразование. М., 1950. [Benveniste, É. Indoevropejskoe imennoe slovoobrazovanie [Indo-European Nominal Word Formation]. Moscow, 1950. (In Russ.)]
  7. Benveniste É. Noms d’agent et noms d’action. Paris, 1948. (In French)
  8. Kuiper F.B.J. Notes on Vedic inflection. Meddeilingen van Koniglike Nederlandshe Akademie van Wetansschappen. 1942, V. 5.
  9. Eichner H. Die Etymologie von hethitischen mehur. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft, 1971, Hf. 31. (In German)
  10. Schindler J. Zum hethitischen nekuz. Zeitschrift zur Kunde der indogermanischen Sprachen. 1967. Bd. 80. (In German)
  11. Schindler J. L’apophonie des noms-racines indo-européens // Bulletin de la Société de linguistique de Paris. 1972. v. 67. (In French)
  12. Schindler J. L’apophonie des themes indo-européens -r-/-n-. Bulletin de la Société de linguistique de Paris. 1975. v. 70. (In French)
  13. Narten J. Zum proterodynamischen Präsens. Prátidāṇam: Essays in Honor F.B.J. Kuiper. Hague, 1968. (In German)
  14. Tichy E. Einführumg in die indogermanische Sprachwissenschaft. 2001. (In German)
  15. Fortson B. Introduction in Indo-Europan languages and culture. 2004.
  16. Clackson J. Introduction in Indo-European Linguistics. Oxford, 2007.
  17. Meier-Brügger M. Indogermanische Sprachwissenschaft. Berlin: De Gruiter, 2010. (In German)
  18. Герценберг Л.Г. Краткое введение в индоевропеистику. СПб., 2010. [Herzenberg, L.G. Kratkoe vvedenie v indoevropeistiku [A Brief Introduction to Indo-European Studies]. St. Petersburg, 2010. (In Russ.)]
  19. Beekes R.S.P. Comparative Indo-European Linguistics. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2011.
  20. Красухин К.Г. Очерки по реконструкции индоевропейского синтаксиса. М., 2005. [Krasuhin, K.G. Ocherki po rekonstrukcii indoevropejskogo sintaksisa [Essays on the Reconstruction of Indo-European Syntax]. Moscow, 2005. (In Russ.)]
  21. Rasmussen J.R. The Growth of IE Ablaut: Contrastive Accent and Vr̥ddhi. Carlene Jones-Bley et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 11th Annual UCLA Indo-European conference. Washington, 2001.
  22. Kronasser H. Etymologie der hethitischen Sprache. Wiesbaden, 1966. (In German)
  23. Miller D.G. Studies in the form of Genitiv singular in Indo-European: Dissertation PhD. Harvard University. Cambridge, 1967.
  24. Schmitt-Brandt R. Die Entwicklung des indogermanischen Vokalsystems. Heidelberg, 1967. (In German)
  25. Kluge F. Handbuch des Urgermanischen. Heidelberg, 1913. (In German)
  26. Прокош Э. Сравнительная грамматика германских языков. М., 1955. [Prokosh, E. Sravnitelnaya grammatika germanskih yazykov [Comparative Grammar of Germanic Languages]. Moscow, 1955. (In Russ.)]
  27. Lehmann W.P. Proto-Indo-European Phonology. Austin; London, 1952.
  28. Сравнительная грамматика германских языков. М., 1962. Т. 2. [Sravnitelnaya grammatika germanskih yazykov [Comparative Grammar of the Germanic Languages]. Moscow, 1962. Vol. 2. (In Russ.)]
  29. Nagy G. The Greek dialects as a reflex of Indo-European processes. Cambridge MA, 1971.
  30. Chantraine P. La formation des noms en Grec ancient. Paris, 1933. (In French)
  31. Buck C.D. The Greek dialects. Chicago, 1955.
  32. Szemerenyi O. Syncope in Greek and Indo-European and the nature of Ido-European Accent. Napoli, 1964.
  33. Fulk R. The Origins of Indo-European quantitative ablaut. Innsbruck, 1986.
  34. Borgstrøm K. Internal reconstruction of Pre-Indo-European // Word. 1954. v. 10.
  35. Widmer P. Das Korn des weiten Feldes. Innsbruck, 2004. (In German)
  36. Красухин К.Г. Аспекты индоевропейской реконструкции: Акцентология. Морфология. Синтаксис. М., 2004. [Krasuhin, K.G. Aspekty indoevropejskoj rekonstrukcii: Akcentologiya. Morfologiya. Sintaksis [Aspects of Indo-European Reconstruction: Accentology. Morphology. Syntax]. Moscow, 2004. (In Russ.)]
  37. Vaan M. de. “Narten” roots from the Avestan point of view. Per aspera ad asteriscos: Studia indogrmanica in honorem Jens Elmgǻrd Rasmussen sexageni Idibus Martibus MMIV. Ed. A. Hyllested et al. Innsbruck, 2004.
  38. Beekes R.S.P. The Origins of Indo-European nominal inflection. Innsbruck, 1985.
  39. Tremblay X. La declinaison des noms de parenté indo-européens en -ter. Innsbruck, 2003. (In French)
  40. Stang Chr. Indo-européen *gwōm, *d(i)i̯ēm. Stang Chr. Opuscula linguistica. Oslo, 1970.
  41. Beekes R.S.P. A Grammar of Gatha-Avestan. Leiden et al., 1988.
  42. Martinez J,, Vaan de V. Introduccion al Avestico. Madrid, 2001.
  43. Kuryłowicz J. Indogermanische Grammatik. Heidelberg, 1968. Bd. II: Ablaut. Akzent. (In German)
  44. Stüber K. Die ptimäre s-Stämme des Indogermanischen. Wiesbaden, 2002. (In German)
  45. Hock W. Interne Rekonstruktion und Akzentparadigma. Indo-European Accent and Ablaut. Ed. G. Keydana et al. Kopenhagen, 2013. (In German)
  46. Трофимов А.А. Развитие индоевропейских консонантных сочетаний, содержащих s, в греко-армяно-индоиранском ареале: дис. … канд. филол. наук. М., 2016. [Trofimov, A.A. Razvitie indoevropejskih konsonantnyh sochetanij, soderzhashchih s, v greko-armyano-indoiranskom areale. Diss. … kand. filol. nauk [The Development of Indo-European Consonant Combinations Containing s in the Greek-Armenian-Indo-Iranian Area. Diss. ... Candidate of Philology]. Moscow, 2016. (In Russ.)]
  47. Nussbaum A. Adjectives and other Derivatives of “tÒmoj-Type”. Verbal Adjectives and Participles in Indo-European languages = Adjectifs verbaux et participes en les langues indo-europèennes. Ed. C. Le Feuvre et al. Bremen, 2017.
  48. Степанов Ю.С. Индоевропейское предложение. М., 1989. [Stepanov, Yu.S. Indoevropejskoe predlozhenie [Indo-European Sentence]. Moscow, 1989. (In Russ.)]

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences