Phenibut, Semax and GIZh-290 Modulate Cortical mGluII Receptors in an Attention Deficit Model in Mice


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

In our previous experiments, it was found that the nootropic drugs piracetam (200 mg/kg/day, intraperitoneally), pantogam (100), pantogam active (200), phenibut (70), semax (0.6), as well as a new derivative of racetam GIZh-290 (3) and the comparison drug atomoxetine (3.0) as a result of subchronic administration, attention stability to new objects is restored in the “closed enriched cross maze” test, showing selectivity of the effect in relation to a subpopulation of CD-1 mice with an initially low attention index (ED-Low). In this study, the effect of nootropics on metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRII) in the prefrontal cortex of these mice was studied using the receptor binding of a specific radioligand [G-3H]LY354740. It was found that the density (Bmax) of mGluII receptors in the brains of subpopulation with the ED-Low phenotype was 11–25% lower than in subpopulation with the ED-High phenotype. None of the drugs had an effect on these receptors in the subpopulation with the ED-High phenotype, whereas phenibut, semax and GIZh-290 showed efficacy with respect to the ED-Low phenotype, increasing Bmax values by 60, 19 and 22%, respectively. Thus, it was shown for the first time that mGluRII are involved in the pathogenesis of attention impairment, and the ability of phenibut, semax and GIZh-290 (2,6-dimethylanilide (2-oxo-4-phenylpyrrolidine-1-yl) acetate to selectively normalize the reduced density of these receptors indicates the prospects of their use in as a drugs for the treatment of attention deficit disorder.

About the authors

N. A. Sukhorukova

Zakusov Research Institute of Pharmacology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: nchjournal@gmail.com
Russia, Moscow

E. V. Vasileva

Zakusov Research Institute of Pharmacology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: nchjournal@gmail.com
Russia, Moscow

G. I. Kovalev

Zakusov Research Institute of Pharmacology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: nchjournal@gmail.com
Russia, Moscow

References

  1. Michele di F., Prichep L., John E. R., Chabot R. J. // International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2005. № 58. P. 81–93.
  2. Arnsten A.F.T. // CNS Drugs. 2009. № 23. Suppl. 1. P. 33–41.
  3. Bush G. // Neuropsychopharmacology Reviews. 2010. № 35. P. 278–300.
  4. Arnsten A.F.T., Pliszka S.R. // Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2011. V. 99. № 2. P. 211–216.
  5. Faraone S.V. // Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2018. № 87. P. 255–270.
  6. Van der Kooij M.A., Glennon J.C. // Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2007. № 31. P. 597–618.
  7. Leo D., Gainetdinov R.R. // Cell Tissue Res. 2013. № 354. P. 259–271.
  8. Asherson P., Gurling H. // Behavioral neuroscience of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and its treatment / Eds Stanford C., Tannock R. Springer-Berlin, Heidelberg. 2012. P. 238-273.
  9. Ковалёв Г.И., Сухорукова Н.А., Васильева Е.В., Кондрахин Е.А., Салимов Р.М. // Биомедицинская химия. 2021. Т. 67. № 5. С. 402–410.
  10. Ковалёв Г.И., Сухорукова Н.А., Васильева Е.В., Кондрахин Е.А, Салимов Р.М. // Экспериментальная и клиническая фармакология. 2021. Т. 84. № 4. С. 3–11.
  11. Ковалёв Г.И., Сухорукова Н.А., Кондрахин Е.А., Васильева Е.В., Салимов Р.М. // Химико-фармацевтический журнал. 2021. Т. 55. № 8. С. 10–14.
  12. Ковалёв Г.И., Сухорукова Н.А., Кондрахин Е.А., Васильева Е.В., Салимов Р.М. // Экспериментальная и клиническая фармакология. 2021 Т. 84. № 6. С. 3–10.
  13. Ковалев Г.И., Салимов Р.М., Сухорукова Н.А., Кондрахин Е.А., Васильева Е.В. // Нейрохимия. 2020. Т. 37. № 1. С. 1–9.
  14. Moretto E., Murru L., Martano G., Sassone J., Passafaro M. // Progress in Neuropsychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry. 2018. № 84. P. 328–342.
  15. Mukherjee S., Manahan-Vaughan D. // Neuropharmacology. 2013. № 66. P. 65–81.
  16. Elia J., Glessner J., Wang K., Shtir C. // Nat. Genet. 2012. № 44. P. 78–84.
  17. Chaki S., Ago Y., Palucha-Paniewiera A., Matrisciano F., Pilc A. // Neuropharmacology. 2013. № 66. P. 40–52.
  18. Marek G.J. // European Journal of Pharmacology. 2010. V. 639. P. 81–90.
  19. Pozzi L., Baviera M, Sacchetti G., Calcagno E., Balducci C., Invernizzi R.W., Carli M. // Neuroscience. 2011. V. 176. P. 336–348.
  20. Glowinski J., Iversen L.L. // J Neurochem. 1966. V. 13. № 8. P. 655–669.
  21. Schaffhauser H., Richards J.G., Cartmell J., Chaboz S., Kemp J.A. // Mol. Pharmacol. 1998. V. 53. № 2. P. 228–233.
  22. Waterborg J.H., Matthews H.R. // Methods Mol. Biol. 1984. V. 1. P. 1–3.
  23. Сухорукова Н.А., Васильева Е.В., Кондрахин Е.А., Салимов Р.М., Ковалёв Г.И. // Фармакокинетика и фармакодинамика. 2022. № 2. С. 23–31.
  24. Kniazeff J., Prezeau L., Rondard P., Pin J., Bettler B. // Pharmacol. Ther. 2011. V. 130. № 1. P. 9–25.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2.

Download (334KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 Н.А. Сухорукова, Е.В. Васильева, Г.И. Ковалёв