Human rights: problems of conceptualization, positivization and protection. On the 75th anniversary of the universal declaration of human rights (All-russian scientific conference With international participation)

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

On October 18, 2023 the Institute of State and Law of the RAS hosted the All-Russian Scientific Conference with international participation “Human rights: problems of conceptualization, positivization and protection. On the 75th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights”. It was attended by representatives of leading Russian scientific and educational institutions, as well as researchers from Belarus and Uzbekistan. The Conference emphasized the continuing importance of the Universal Declaration for the establishment of international human rights standards. The participants of the scientific event discussed a wide range of problems related to the development of the doctrine of human rights and the practice of their protection in modern conditions characterized by the increasing complexity of international relations, the diversification of social inequalities and the introduction of new technologies.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Natalia Varlamova

Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Science

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: varlam_n@list.ru

PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Leading Researcher,  Department of the Human Rights, Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences;

俄罗斯联邦, 10 Znamenka str., 119019 Moscow

Tatiana Vasilieva

Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Science

Email: tan-vas@mail.ru

Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Chief Researcher,  Department of the Human Rights, Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences

俄罗斯联邦, 10 Znamenka str., 119019 Moscow

参考

  1. Hobbes T. Leviathan. M., 2001 (in Russ.).
  2. Locke J. Two treatises on government / transl. from English by E. S. Lagutin, Yu. V. Semenov. Chelyabinsk, 2014 (in Russ.).
  3. Foucault M. The birth of biopolitics. A course of lectures delivered at the College de France in the 1978–1979 academic year / transl. from French by A. V. Dyakov. SPb., 2010 (in Russ.).
  4. Bevilacqua G., Beatriz M. Why Addressing Unsafe Abortion is Central to the Post-2015 UN Development Agenda (November 20, 2012). URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2484243; http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2484243 (accessed: 29.01.2024).
  5. Capra F., Mattei U. The Ecology of Law: Toward a Legal System in Tune with Nature and Community. San Francisco, 2015. Pp. 289, 291.
  6. Ferry L. Le nouvel ordre écologique. L’arbre, l’animal et l’homme. Paris, 1992.
  7. Henrico R. Judicial Review in South Africa and India: Advancing Constitutionalism or Undue Activism? // Obiter. 2022. Vol. 43. No. 4. P. 797.
  8. Kapelańska-Pręgowska J. The Scales of the European Court of Human Rights: Abortion Restriction in Poland, the European Consensus, and the State’s Margin of Appreciation // Health and Human Rights Journal. 2021. Vol. 23. Iss. 2. Pp. 218, 219.
  9. Kühl K. Zwei Aufgaben für ein modernes Naturrecht // Das Naturrechtsdenken Heute und Morgen: Gedächtnisschrift für René Marcic / hrsg. von D. Mayer-Maly von, P. M. Simmons. Berlin, 1983. Ss. 817–832.
  10. Mbembe A. Necropolitics. NY, 2019.
  11. Sękowska-Kozłowska K. A Tough Job: Recognizing Access to Abortion as a Matter of Equality. A commentary on the Views of the UN Human Rights Committee in the Cases of Mellet v. Ireland and Whelan v. Ireland // Reproductive Health Matters. 2018. Vol. 26. No. 54. Pp. 25–31.
  12. Serres M. Le contrat naturel. Paris, 1990.
  13. Women’s access to safe abortion in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Advancing maternal health, gender equality, and reproductive rights. Ipas. URL: https://www.ipas.org/resource/womens-access-to-safe-abortion-in-the-2030-agenda-for-sustainable-development- advancing-maternal-health-gender-equality-and-reproductive-rights/ (accessed: 29.01.2024).

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024