Contemporary Europe at the intersection of Washington and Brussels

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

The political dilemma faced by leading European countries – between “transatlantic commitment” and the pursuit of Europe’s “strategic autonomy” is analyzed. Amid growing centrifugal tendencies within NATO and the formation of coalitions on security issues within the EU, a qualitatively new configuration is emerging within the “strategic triangle” of Russia–United States–Europe. This process is less of the establishment of a new security architecture and more of the search for institutional forms capable of adapting to the rapidly evolving nature of US–Russia relations and transatlantic cooperation. Against this backdrop, proposals for the creation of an alternative military configuration outside of NATO remain largely a political and symbolic tool for intra-EU mobilization rather than a practically feasible initiative. Particular attention is paid to the policies of key European actors – France, Germany, Finland, the Baltic States, and Poland – whose approaches to military development and relations with the United States are marked by increasing polarization.

作者简介

S. Oznobishchev

Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: serko96@gmail.com
Moscow, Russia

V. Klimov

Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations of the Russian Academy of Sciences

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: vasily-klimov@mail.ru
Moscow, Russia

参考

  1. Александр Коновалов. Наследие (2021) Ред.: С. Ознобищев, В. Климов. М.: ИП Пахомова Е.А. 508 с.
  2. Aleksandr Konovalov. Naslediye [Legacy] (2021) Ed(s): S.K. Oznobishchev, V.A. Klimov. Moscow: IE Pakhomova E.A. 508 p. (In Russ.)
  3. Громыко А. (2021) Субъектность Евросоюза ‒ между атлантизмом и европоцентризмом // Современная Европа. № 4. С. 10–26.
  4. Gromyko A. (2021) Subjectivity of the European Union – Between Atlanticism and Eurocentrism. Contemporary Europe. no. 4, pp. 10–26. (In Russ.)
  5. Международная безопасность: новый миропорядок и технологическая революция (2023). ИМЭМО РАН. Отв. ред. А.Г. Арбатов, К.В. Богданов, О.В. Гусарова, М.Г. Евтодьева. Москва: «Весь Мир». 432 с.
  6. Mezhdunarodnaya bezopasnost: novy mirovoy poryadok i tekhnologicheskaya revolutsiya [International security: the new world order and technology revolution] (2023) IMEMO. Ed(s): A.G. Arbatov, K.V. Bogdanov, O.V. Gusarova, M.G. Evtodieva. Moscow: VES MIR. 432 p. (In Russ.)
  7. Никитин А. (2020) Тенденции военно-политического развития и военно-технического сотрудничества стран Евросоюза // Актуальные проблемы Европы. № 4. С. 53–74.
  8. Nikitin A. (2020) Trends in Military-political Development and Military-technical Cooperation of the European Union Countries. Current Problems of Europe. no. 4, pp. 53–74. (In Russ.)
  9. Ознобищев С., Климов В. (2024) «Новая» милитаризация Европы? // Мировая экономика и международные отношения, 2024, т. 68, № 12. С. 14–25.
  10. Oznobishchev S., Klimov V. (2024) “New” Militarization of Europe? World Eсonomy and International Relations, vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 14–25. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2024-68-12-14-25 EDN: UILXYS (In Russ.)
  11. Perry W.J. (2015) My Journey at the Nuclear Brink. Redwood City: Stanford University Press. 234 p.
  12. Toal G. (2017) Near Abroad: Putin, the West, and the Contest over Ukraine and the Caucasus. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 387 p.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025