The art of artificial intelligence in the perspective of philosophical anthropology: how have creative machines influenced human self-awareness?

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат ақылы немесе тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

This paper aims to clarify the understanding of the significance of artificial intelligence (AI) art from the perspective of philosophical anthropology and explain how AI art may influence human self-consciousness. Currently, with the advancements of related technologies, generative AI is widely used in artistic creation, and already has attracted attention from the art community and researchers. However, there are many debates surrounding these works. One key issue is AI’s creativity itself: traditional understanding of art asserts that AI cannot possess creativity, yet experiments have already shown that people cannot distinguish between artworks created by AI and those by human artists. Many contemporary philosophers believe that creativity is not exclusively a human trait, thus there are no barriers to recognizing AI as an art creator. The author of this paper believes that the issue of AI’s creativity cannot be simply solved and it does not simply help us understand AI art better at all. Therefore, the author seeks to develop F.I. Girenok’s philosophical anthropology in a direction that focuses on our hallucinations and hallucenosises, which will help us better understand the artistic nature of AI creations and their impact on our self-consciousness.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

Wang Weiyu

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: van9161605865@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-7528-4238

M.A. Student in Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Philosophical Anthropology

Ресей, 27 Lomonosov avenue, Build. 4, Moscow 119192

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Гегель Г.В.Ф. Лекции по эстетике: Введение / пер. с нем. Б.Г. Столпнера // Гегель Г.В.Ф. Эстетика: в 4 т. / общ. ред. М.А. Лифшица. Т. 1. М.: Искусство, 1968. C. 7–96. Hegel G.W.F. Lektsii po estetike: Vvedenie [Lectures on Aesthetics: Introduction], transl. from German by B.G. Stolpner. Hegel G.W.F. Estetika: v 4 t. [Aesthetics in 4 vols.], ed by M.A. Lifshits. Vol. 1. Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ., 1968. P. 7–96.
  2. Гиренок Ф.И. Закат греческого мифа о человеке и бытии // Вестник СПБГУ. Философия и конфликтология. 2021. № 3. С. 554–567. Girenok F.I. Zakat grecheskogo mifa o cheloveke i bytii [The Decline of the Greek Myth about Man and Being]. Vestnik SPBGU. Filosofiya i konfliktologiya. 2021. N 3. P. 554–567.
  3. Гиренок Ф.И. Кризис субъекта // Литературная Газета. 2015. № 34 [Электроный ресурс]. URL: https://lgz.ru/article/-34-6522-2-09-2015/krizis-subekta/ (дата обращения: 31.10.2024). Girenok F.I. Krizis subekta [Crisis of the subject]. Literaturnaya Gazeta. 2015. N 34 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://lgz.ru/article/-34-6522-2-09-2015/krizis-subekta/ (date of access: 31.10.2024).
  4. Гиренок Ф.И. О двух философских стратегиях в исследовании человека // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2020. № 457. С. 66–71. Girenok F.I. O dvuh filosofskih strategiyah v issledovanii cheloveka [On Two Philosophical Strategies in the Study of Man]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2020. N 457. P. 66–71.
  5. Гиренок Ф.И. О новой методологии неестественных наук // Философия хозяйства. 2024a. № 5. С. 169–182. Girenok F.I. O novoj metodologii neestestvennyh nauk [On a New Methodology of the Non-natural Sciences]. Filosofiya hozyajstva. 2024. N 5. P. 169–182.
  6. Гиренок Ф.И. О совпадении неясной сущности времени и человека // Человек. 2024b. Т. 35, № 1. С. 9–25. Girenok F.I. O sovpadenii neyasnoj sushchnosti vremeni i cheloveka [About the Coincidence of the Unclear Essence of Time and Human]. Chelovek. 2024b. Vol. 35, N 1. P. 9–25.
  7. Гиренок Ф.И. Признаки постхайдеггерианского мышления // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 7. Философия. 2019. № 2. С. 19–25. Girenok F.I. Priznaki posthajdeggerianskogo myshleniya [Signs of Post-Heidegger Thinking]. Vestnik moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 7. Filosofiya. 2019. N 2. P. 19–25.
  8. Гиренок Ф.И. Сознание и аффект в антропологическом дискурсе // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2023. № 487. С. 50–54. Girenok F.I. Soznanie i affekt v antropologicheskom diskurse [Consciousness and Affect in Anthropological Discourse]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2023. N 487. C. 50–54.
  9. Гиренок Ф.И. Фигуры и складки. М.: Академический Проект, 2014. Girenok F.I. Figury i skladki [Figures and Folds]. Moscow: Akademicheskij Proekt Publ., 2014.
  10. Гиренок Ф.И. Ценности и смыслы в галлюценозе русского сознания: Монография. М.: Проспект, 2024c. Girenok F.I. Cennosti i smysly v gallyucenoze russkogo soznaniya: Monografiya [Values and Meanings in the Hallucenosis of Russian Consciousness: Monograph]. Moscow: Prospekt Publ., 2024c.
  11. Колесник М.А., Омелик А.А. Искусственный интеллект в сфере культуры и искусства: обзор зарубежных публикаций // Социология искусственного интеллекта. 2024. Т. 5, № 2. С. 59–72. Kolesnik M.A., Omelik A.A. Iskusstvennyj intellekt v sfere kultury i iskusstva: obzor zarubezhnyh publikacij [Artificial Intelligence in the Field of Culture and Art: Review of Foreign Publications]. Sociologiya iskusstvennogo intellekta. 2024. Vol. 5, N 2. P. 59–72.
  12. Широкова М.А. Славянофилы о соотношении «внутреннего» и «внешнего» в конструировании границ российской идентичности // Сибирский философский журнал. 2021. T. 19, № 3. С. 102–114. Shirokova M.A. Slavyanofily o sootnoshenii «vnutrennego» i «vneshnego» v konstruirovanii granic rossijskoj identichnosti [Slavophiles on the Relationship between the “Internal” and the “External” in Constructing the Boundaries of Russian Identity]. Sibirskij filosofskij zhurnal. 2021. Vol. 19, N 3. P. 102–114.
  13. Boden M.A. The creative mind: myths and mechanisms. London: Routledge, 2004.
  14. Coeckelbergh M. Can machines create art? Philosophy & Technology. 2017. Vol. 30, N 7. P. 285–303.
  15. Elgammal A., Liu B., Elhoseiny M., Mazzone M. CAN: Creative adversarial networks, generating “art” by learning about styles and deviating from style norms. 2017 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.07068 (date of access: 16.01.2025).
  16. Cetinic E., She J. Understanding and Creating Art with AI: Review and Outlook. 2022 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.09109 (date of access: 16.01.2025).
  17. Hertzmann A. Computers do not make art, people do. Communications of the ACM. 2020. Vol. 63, N 5. P. 45–48.
  18. Tao F. A new harmonisation of art and technology: Philosophic interpretations of artificial intelligence art. Critical Arts. 2022. Vol. 36, N 1–2. P. 110–125.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025