Traditions, continuity and innovations in psychological and historical-scientific cognition
- Authors: Noskova O.G.1
- 
							Affiliations: 
							- Lomonosov Moscow State University
 
- Issue: Vol 46, No 3 (2025)
- Pages: 147-150
- Section: Discussion
- URL: https://vietnamjournal.ru/0205-9592/article/view/688385
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0205959225030139
- ID: 688385
Cite item
Abstract
The text was prepared in the order of the discussion on the pages of the Psychological Journal of the article by Yu.N. Oleinik and A.L. Zhuravlev “Scientific traditions as a mechanism of continuity of psycholo-gical cognition”, published in two parts: Part 1. — “The state and difficulties of studying” and Part 2. — “Problems and prospects of research” (Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, № 3–4, 2024). The valuable ideas of the article under discussion, which are important for psychological science and its history, are noted; in addition, controversial provisions are highlighted, and options for their correction and addition are proposed.
Full Text
 
												
	                        About the authors
O. G. Noskova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
							Author for correspondence.
							Email: nog4813@mail.ru
				                					                																			                								
ScD (Psychology), Professor, Professor of Department of Work and Engineering Psychology, Faculty of Psychology
Russian Federation, 125009, Moscow, Mokhovaya str., 11/9References
- Bogdanov A.A. Nauka ob obshhestvennom soznanii. Kratkij kurs ideologicheskoj nauki v voprosah i otvetah. Moscow: Knigoizdatel’stvo pisatelej v Moskve, 1914. 199 p.
- Gajdenko P.P. Vvedenie. Tradicii i revoljucii v istorii nauki. Ed. P.P. Gajdenko. Moscow: Nauka, 1991. P. 3–11.
- Gusel’ceva M.S. Ponjatie progressa i ego otrazhenie v naukah o cheloveke. Progress psihologii: Kriterii i priznaki. Eds. A.L. Zhuravlev, T.D. Marcinkovskaya, A.V. Jurevich. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN, 2009. P. 13–31.
- Kuznecova N.I., Rozov M.A. O raznoobrazii nauchnyh revoljucij. Tradicii i revoljucii v istorii nauki. Ed. P.P. Gajdenko. Moscow: Nauka, 1991. P. 60–82.
- Nosulenko V.N., Terehin V.A. Peredacha znanij: obzor osnovnyh modelej i tehnologij. Jeksperimental’naja psihologija. 2017. V. 10. № 4. P. 96–115.
- Olejnik Ju.N., Zhuravlev A.L. Nauchnye tradicii kak mehanizm preemstvennosti psihologicheskogo poznanija. Chast’ 1. Sostojanie i trudnosti izuchenija. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2024. V. 45. № 3. P. 5–14.
- Olejnik Ju.N. Zhuravlev A.L. Nauchnye tradicii kak mehanizm preemstvennosti psihologicheskogo poznanija. Chast’ 2. Problemy, podhody i perspektivy issledovanija. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2024. V. 45. № 4. P. 5–15.
- Tradicii i revoljucii v istorii nauki. Ed. P.P. Gajdenko. Moscow: Nauka, 1991. 264 p.
- Shackij E. Utopija i tradicija: Perev. s pol’sk. Ed. V.A. Chalikova. Moscow: Progress, 1990. 454 p.
- Jurevich A.V. Psihologija i metodologija. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN, 2005. 312 p.
- Nonaka I., Takeuchi H. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Creat the Dinamics of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Supplementary files
 
				
			 
					 
						 
						 
						 
						 
									

 
  
  
  Email this article
			Email this article 
 Open Access
		                                Open Access Access granted
						Access granted