Application of the functionally homogeneous regions (FHR) method to identify the most informative regions of the human brain for binary classification of schizophrenia based on resting-state functional MRI data

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The article presents results of the analysis of the most informative brain regions for diagnosing schizophrenia based on resting-state functional MRI data using method of functionally homogeneous regions (FHR) previously developed by the authors and the CONN functional atlas. The analysis was performed using fMRI data from 32 subjects diagnosed with schizophrenia and 36 subjects from the control group obtained on Siemens tomograph. Data from 19 subjects diagnosed with schizophrenia and 29 subjects from the control group obtained on General Electric MRI scanner were used for verification. Eight most informative regions were identified. The analysis of the identified regions showed that changing the composition of the training group significantly affects the list of the most significant regions. At the same time the analysis of the identified most significant regions for repeatability with varying the composition of subjects showed that out of the eight identified most significant regions, four have repeatability higher than 70%, two have repeatability from 50% to 70%, and two have repeatability from 30% to 50%. This may indicate that the identified regions are not random and opens up prospects for further in-depth analysis and determination of their significance in diagnosing schizophrenia. Verification carried out on data from General Electric MRI scanner partially confirmed the heightened importance of the identified regions for the classification of schizophrenia pathology, but no perfect match was achieved on datasets from different MRI scanners.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

A. Poyda

National Research Center “Kurtchatov Institute”

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: Poyda_AA@nrcki.ru
Ресей, Moscow

S. Kozlov

National Research Center “Kurtchatov Institute”

Email: Poyda_AA@nrcki.ru
Ресей, Moscow

A. Zhemchuzhnikov

National Research Center “Kurtchatov Institute”

Email: Poyda_AA@nrcki.ru
Ресей, Moscow

V. Orlov

National Research Center “Kurtchatov Institute”

Email: Poyda_AA@nrcki.ru
Ресей, Moscow

S. Kartashov

National Research Center “Kurtchatov Institute”

Email: Poyda_AA@nrcki.ru
Ресей, Moscow

L. Bravve

Psychiatric Hospital no. 1 Named after N.A. Alexeev of the Department of Health of Moscow

Email: Poyda_AA@nrcki.ru
Ресей, Moscow

М. Kaydan

Psychiatric Hospital no. 1 Named after N.A. Alexeev of the Department of Health of Moscow

Email: Poyda_AA@nrcki.ru
Ресей, Moscow

G. Kostyuk

Psychiatric Hospital no. 1 Named after N.A. Alexeev of the Department of Health of Moscow

Email: Poyda_AA@nrcki.ru
Ресей, Moscow

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Жемчужников А.Д., Карташов С.И., Козлов С.О., Орлов В.А., Пойда А.А., Захарова Н.В., Бравве Л.В., Мамедова Г.Ш., Кайдан М.А. Поиск наиболее информативных регионов для бинарной классификации шизофрении по данным фМРТ состояния покоя на основе метода выделения функционально однородных регионов. Журнал высшей нервной деятельности им. И.П. Павлова. 2024. Т. 74. №4. C. 412–425. doi: 10.31857/S0044467724040035
  2. Солохина Т., Ошевский Д., Бархатова А., Кузьминова М., Тюменкова Г., Алиева Л., Штейнберг А., Чуркина А. Самостигматизации у пациентов с эндогенными психическими расстройствами: кроссекционное сравнительное исследование. Consortium Psychiatricum. 2024. Т. 5. №1. C. 13–26. doi: 10.17816/CP15485
  3. Algumaei A.H., Algunaid R.F., Rushdi M.A., Yassine I.A. Feature and decision-level fusion for schizophrenia detection based on resting-state fMRI data. PLOS ONE 2022. 17, e0265300. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265300
  4. Blinowska K.J. Review of the methods of determination of directed connectivity from multichannel data. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing. 2011. 49. 521–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-011-0739-x
  5. Du Y., Fu Z, Sui J., Gao S., Xing Y., Lin D., Salman M., Abrol A., Rahaman M.A., Chen J., Hong L.E., Kochunov P., Osuch E.A., Calhoun V.D.; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. NeuroMark: An automated and adaptive ICA based pipeline to identify reproducible fMRI markers of brain disorders. Neuroimage Clin. 2020; 28:102375. Epub 2020 Aug 11. PMID: 32961402; PMCID: PMC7509081. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102375
  6. Eklund A., Dufort P., Villani M., Laconte S. BROCCOLI: Software for fast fMRI analysis on many-core CPUs and GPUs. Front Neuroinform. 2014 Mar 14;8:24. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2014.00024
  7. Freund Y., Schapire R.E. A Short Introduction to Boosting. Journal of Japanese Society of Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 14, No. 5, 1999, pp. 771–780.
  8. Jiang Y., Palaniyappan L., Luo C., Chang X., Zhang J., Tang Y., Zhang T., Li C., Zhou E., Yu X., Li W., An D., Zhou D., Huang C.C., Tsai S.J., Lin C.P., Cheng J., Wang J., Yao D., Cheng W., Feng J.; ZIB Consortium. Neuroimaging epicenters as potential sites of onset of the neuroanatomical pathology in schizophrenia. Sci Adv. 2024 Jun 14;10(24):eadk6063. Epub 2024 Jun 12. PMID: 38865456; PMCID: PMC11168466. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adk6063
  9. Kozlov S., Poyda A., Orlov V., Sharaev M., Ushakov V. Selection of Functionally Homogeneous Human Brain Regions for Functional Connectomes Building Based on fMRI Data. Advances in intelligent systems and computing. 2021. 1358. 709–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71637-0_82
  10. Lauer M., Senitz D., Beckmann H. Increased volume of the nucleus accumbens in schizophrenia. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2001;108 (6):645–60. PMID: 11478417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007020170042
  11. Nie Y., Murad T., Miao H.Y., Bhattarai P., Thakuri D.S., Chand G.B. Characterizing multivariate regional hubs for schizophrenia classification, sex differences, and brain age estimation using explainable AI. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2025 Mar 4:2025.02.28.25323105. PMID: 40093221; PMCID: PMC11908315. doi: 10.1101/2025.02.28.25323105
  12. Nieto-Castanon A., Whitfield-Gabrieli S. CONN functional connectivity toolbox: RRID SCR_009550, release 22. 2022. https://doi.org/10.56441/hilbertpress.2246.5840
  13. Pedregosa F., Varoquaux G., Gramfort A., Michel V., Thirion B., Grisel O., Blondel M., Müller A., Nothman J., Louppe G., Prettenhofer P., Weiss R., Dubourg V., Vanderplas J., Passos A., Cournapeau D., Brucher M., Perrot M., Duchesnay É. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python [WWW Document]. arXiv.org. 2018. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1201.0490
  14. Shen C.L., Tsai S.J., Lin C.P., Yang A.C. Progressive brain abnormalities in schizophrenia across different illness periods: a structural and functional MRI study. Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2023 Jan 5; 9(1): 2. PMID: 36604437; PMCID: PMC9816110. doi: 10.1038/s41537-022-00328-7
  15. Solmi M., Seitidis G., Mavridis D., Correll C.U., Dragioti E., Guimond S., Tuominen L., Dargél A., Carvalho A.F., Fornaro M., Maes M., Monaco F., Song M., Il Shin J., Cortese S. Incidence, prevalence, and global burden of schizophrenia – data, with critical appraisal, from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2019. Mol Psychiatry. 2023. 28. 5319–5327. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-023-02138-4
  16. Tohid H., Faizan M., Faizan U. Alterations of the occipital lobe in schizophrenia. Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2015 Jul; 20 (3): 213–24.PMID: 26166588; PMCID: PMC4710336. https://doi.org/10.17712/nsj.2015.3.20140757
  17. Voineskos A.N., Hawco C., Neufeld N.H., Turner J.A., Ameis S.H., Anticevic A., Buchanan R.W., Cadenhead K., Dazzan P., Dickie E.W., Gallucci J., Lahti A.C., Malhotra A.K., Öngür D., Lencz T., Sarpal D.K., Oliver L.D. Functional magnetic resonance imaging in schizophrenia: current evidence, methodological advances, limitations and future directions. World Psychiatry. 2024 Feb; 23(1): 26-51. PMID: 38214624; PMCID: PMC10786022. doi: 10.1002/wps.21159.
  18. Zang Y., Jiang T., Lu Y., He Y., Tian L. Regional homogeneity approach to fMRI data analysis. NeuroImage. 2004. 22. 394–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.030
  19. Zhang J., Rao V.M., Tian Y. et al. Detecting schizophrenia with 3D structural brain MRI using deep learning. Sci Rep 13, 14433 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41359-z
  20. Zheng J., Wei X., Wang J., Lin H., Pan H., Shi Y. Diagnosis of Schizophrenia Based on Deep Learning Using fMRI. Comput Math Methods Med. 2021 Nov 9; 2021: 8437260. PMID: 34795793; PMCID: PMC8594998. doi: 10.1155/2021/8437260

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Classification accuracy depending on the maximum number of features/regions.

Жүктеу (92KB)
3. Fig. 2. Probability of regions being among the 8 most significant ones based on the weights calculated by the ExtraTrees algorithm (Siemens MRI scanner data). The values on the horizontal axis correspond to the regions number in the CONN atlas.

Жүктеу (102KB)
4. Fig. 3. Position of the region in the ordered list of their significance averaged on 5000 iterations (Siemens MRI scanner data).

Жүктеу (150KB)
5. Fig. 4. Dependence of classification accuracy on feature removal (Siemens MRI scanner data): blue column – without feature removal; orange – removal of random 8 features; gray – removal of 8 features corresponding to the selected most significant regions.

Жүктеу (119KB)
6. Fig. 5. (а) Probability of regions being among the 8 most significant ones based on the weights calculated by the ExtraTrees algorithm. The values on the horizontal axis correspond to the regions number in the CONN atlas. Red color – regions obtained on General Electric dataset, blue color – regions obtained on Siemens dataset. (б) Position of the region in the ordered list of their significance averaged on 5000 iterations. Red color – regions obtained on General Electric dataset, blue color – regions obtained on Siemens dataset.

Жүктеу (323KB)
7. Fig. 6. Dependence of FHR on the angle of magnetization deviation (General Electric tomograph, one subject).

Жүктеу (139KB)

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025