Energy−Angular Correlations at Inelastic Scattering of Tagged Neutrons by Carbon, Nitrogen, and Oxygen Nuclei

V. F. Batyaev; Батяев В. Ф.; S. G. Belichenko; Беличенко С. Г.; M. D. Karetnikov; Каретников М. Д.; A. D. Maznitcin; Мазницин А. Д.; A. Yu. Presnyakov; Пресняков А. Ю.

doi:10.31857/S0032816223030175

Energy−Angular Correlations at Inelastic Scattering of Tagged Neutrons by Carbon, Nitrogen, and Oxygen Nuclei

Autores: Batyaev V.F.¹^,2, Belichenko S.G.¹, Karetnikov M.D.¹^,2, Maznitcin A.D.¹, Presnyakov A.Y.¹
Afiliações:
1. Dukhov All-Russia Research Institute of Automatics
2. National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute)
Edição: Nº 4 (2023)
Páginas: 5-12
Seção: ТЕХНИКА ЯДЕРНОГО ЭКСПЕРИМЕНТА
URL: https://vietnamjournal.ru/0032-8162/article/view/670456
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0032816223030175
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CVQLBC
ID: 670456

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado

Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado

Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo
Sobre autores
Bibliografia
Arquivos suplementares
Estatísticas

Resumo

Results of neutron activation analysis of substances using tagged neutron technology are rather sensitive to errors in measuring the parameters of γ-ray spectrum peaks. This is the reason for taking into account both the Doppler effect that leads to the shift and broadening of γ-ray spectrum peaks and the anisotropy of the γ-ray yield as a function of the angle between the directions of tagged neutrons and detected γ‑rays. The angular dependences of the shift and intensity (relative area) of γ-ray spectrum peaks for carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen nuclei have been measured at the tagged-neutron facility. The impact of the Doppler shift and anisotropy of the angular distribution in tagged-neutron devices is observed in analysis of extended objects and in case of the cascading arrangement of γ-detectors when γ-rays hit detectors at different angles with respect to the direction of tagged neutrons.

Bibliografia

Bagdasaryan Kh.E., Batyaev V.F, Belichenko S.G., Bestaev R.R., Gavryuchenkov A.V., Karetnikov M.D. // Nucl. Instrum. and Methods in Phys. Res. 2015. V. A 784. P. 412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2014.11.111
Perot B., Carasco C., Bernard S., Mariani A., Szabo J.-L., Sannie G., Roll Th., Valkovic V., Sudac D., Viestid G., Lunardon M., Botosso C., Fabris D., Nebbia G., Pesente S. et al. // Nucl. Instrum and Methods. 2008. V. A588. P. 307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2008.01.097
Кологривов В.И. Эффект Доплера в классической физике. М.: МФТИ, 2012.
Chart of Nuclides. Basic Properties of Atomic Nuclei. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat3/ (дата обращения 18.02.2022).
Кадилин В.В., Рябева Е.В., Самосадный В.Т. Прикладная нейтронная физика. М.: НИЯУ МИФИ, 2011.
Barzilov A., Womble P.C. // J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2014. V. 301. P. 811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-014-3189-8
Evaluated Nuclear Data File (ENDF). [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www-nds.iaea.org/exfor/endf.htm (дата обращения 10.10.2022).
Benetskij B.A., Frank I.M. // Sov. Phys. JETP. 1963. V. 17. № 2. P. 309.
Whitfield D. Doppler-Broadening of Light Nuclei Gamma-Ray Spectra. Masters Theses & Specialist Projects. 2010. Paper 1075. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/1075. (дата обращения 18.02.2022).
Балыгин К.А., Каретников М.Д., Климов А.И., Козлов К.Н., Мелешко Е.А., Осташев И.Е., Яковлев Г.В. // ПТЭ. 2009. № 2. С. 122.
Gilmore R. Practical Gamma-ray Spectrometry. 2nd Edition. UK. John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
Федоров Н.А., Третьякова Т.Ю., Быстрицкий В.М., Копач Ю.Н., Русков И.Н., Ской В.Р., Грозданов Д.Н., Замятин Н.И., Ван Д., Алиев Ф.А., Храмко K., Кумар A., Ганди A., Сапожников М.Г., Рогов Ю.Н. и др. // Ученые записки физического факультета Московского университета. 2018. № 2. С. 820205.
Быстрицкий В.М., Грозданов Д.Н., Зонтиков А.О., Копач Ю.Н., Рогов Ю.Н., Русков И.Н., Садовский А.Б., Ской В.Р., Бармаков Ю.Н., Боголюбов Е.П., Рыжков Н.И., Юрков Д.И. // Письма в ЭЧАЯ. 2016. Т. 13. № 4. С. 793.