<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">The Russian Journal of Vietnamese Studies</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">The Russian Journal of Vietnamese Studies</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вьетнамские исследования</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic">2618-9453</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Institute of China and Contemporary Asia of the RAS</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">677557</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.54631/VS.2025.91-677557</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Scientific researches</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Научные исследования</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Le Quy Don as a Representative of the Enlightenment Age in Vietnam</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Ле Куи Дон как представитель эпохи Просвещения во Вьетнаме</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3948-720X</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Grigoreva</surname><given-names>Nina V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Григорьева</surname><given-names>Нина Валерьевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Ph.D. (History), Associate Professor, Head of the Department for Chinese, South and Southeast Asian Studies</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>к. и. н., доцент, зав. кафедрой исследований Китая, Юго-Восточной и Южной Азии</p></bio><email>ngrigoreva@hse.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">National Research University Higher School of Economics</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">НИУ Высшая школа экономики</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2025-04-08" publication-format="electronic"><day>08</day><month>04</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>80</fpage><lpage>91</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-03-22"><day>22</day><month>03</month><year>2025</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2025-03-31"><day>31</day><month>03</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2025, Grigoreva N.V.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2025, Григорьева Н.В.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Grigoreva N.V.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Григорьева Н.В.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://vietnamjournal.ru/2618-9453/article/view/677557">https://vietnamjournal.ru/2618-9453/article/view/677557</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Based on the global history approaches, the article analyzes activities and intellectual heritage of Le Quy Don, a Vietnamese scholar and encyclopedist of the 18th century. Conceptual aspects and substantial issues of the most notable works compiled by Le Quy Don are explored in the context of the global Enlightenment concept suggested by Sebastian Conrad and compared with defining manifestations of the Enlightenment in various countries in the West and the East.</p> <p>As a result of the research, the author concludes that Le Quy Don’s activities for the accumulation, systematization and spreading of knowledge, his ideas and contribution to the social development of Vietnam make him not only an outstanding light-bringer in Vietnam history but also one of the prominent figures of the Enlightenment era which is understood as a universal phenomenon of global history.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>В статье представлен анализ деятельности и интеллектуального наследия вьетнамского ученого-энциклопедиста XVIII в. Ле Куи Дона. Идеологические и содержательные аспекты наиболее значимых произведений Ле Куи Дона рассматриваются в контексте концепции глобального Просвещения, предложенной Себастьяном Конрадом, и сопоставляются с наиболее характерными проявлениями эпохи Просвещения в разных странах Запада и Востока.</p> <p>На основе проведённого анализа автор приходит к выводу о том, что деятельность Ле Куи Дона по накоплению, систематизации и распространению знаний, его идеи и вклад в общественное развитие Вьетнама позволяют считать учёного не только выдающимся просветителем Вьетнама, но и одним из заметных деятелей эпохи Просвещения, понимаемой как универсальный феномен глобальной истории.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>global history</kwd><kwd>Age of Enlightenment</kwd><kwd>Vietnam</kwd><kwd>Le Quy Don</kwd><kwd>intellectual heritage</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>глобальная история</kwd><kwd>эпоха Просвещения</kwd><kwd>Вьетнам</kwd><kwd>Ле Куи Дон</kwd><kwd>интеллектуальное наследие</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Clavin, P. (2010). Time, manner, place: Writing modern European history in global, transnational and international contexts. European History Quarterly, 40 (4): 624–640.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кант И. Ответ на вопрос: что такое Просвещение? // Сочинения в 4-х томах на немецком и русском языках. Т. 1. Трактаты и статьи (1784–1796). С.124–147.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Conrad, S. (2012). Enlightenment in Global History: A Historiographical Critique. The American Historical Review, 117 (4): 999–1027.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Никитин А.В. Универсальные характеристики традиционной вьетнамской мысли // Универсалии восточных культур. М.: РАН, 2001. С. 244–289.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Đoàn Lê Giang (2012). Hải quốc đồ chí của Ngụy Nguyên và ảnh hưởng của nó đến phong trào Duy tân Nhật Bản, Việt Nam [Doan Le Giang. Illustrated Treatise on Maritime Kingdoms by Wei Yuan and Its Impact on the Modernisation in Japan and Vietnam], in: Nhật Bản và Việt Nam trong phong trào «văn minh hóa» cuối thế kỉ XIX đầu thế kỉ XX [Japan and Vietnam in the “civilizational” movement of the late 19th – early 20th centuries]. Hà Nội: Nxb. Giáo dục. Tr. 175–183. (In Vietnamese)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Никулин Н.И. Вьетнамская литература. От средних веков к новому времени. X–XIX вв. М.: Наука, 1977.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Foucault, M. [2002 (1984)]. Chto takoe Prosveschenie? [What Is Enlightenment?], in: Intellektualy i vlast [Intellectuals and power]. T. 1. Moskva. S. 335–359. (In Russian)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Никулин Н.И. Российские онимы в контексте открытия Вьетнамом Западного мира (по сочинениям вьетнамских авторов XVIII – начала XIX в.) // Этнографическое обозрение. 2000. № 5. С. 57–69.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kant, I. [1993 (1784)]. Otvet na vopros: chto takoe Prosveschenie? [Answering the Question: What Is Enlightenment?], in: Sochineniya v 4-h tomah na nemetskom i russkom yazyikah. Tom 1. Traktaty i statyi (1784–1796) [Works in 4 volumes in German and Russian. V. 1. Treatises and articles (1784–1796)]. S. 124–147. (In Russian)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Новая история Вьетнама / отв. ред. С.А. Мхитарян. М.: Наука, 1980.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lê Quý Đôn [1962 (1773)]. Vân đài loại ngữ [Le Quy Don. Classified Sayings from the Imperishable Library]. Т. I. Hà Nội. (In Vietnamese)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ремарчук В.В., Фам Ван Кхоай. Некоторые количественные характеристики иероглифического текста трактата Ле Куи Дона “Ван дай лоай нгы” // Традиционный Вьетнам. Вып. II. М., 1996. С. 224–229.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lê Quý Đôn [2007 (1776)]. Phủ biên tạp lục [Le Quy Don. Miscellaneous Chronicles of the Pacified Frontier]. Hà Nội: Nxb. Khoa học Xã hội. (In Vietnamese)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фам Ван Кхоай. Вопросы формы и содержания трактата Ле Куи Дона “Ван дай лоай нгы” // Традиционный Вьетнам. Вып. II. М., 1996. С. 216–223.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lin Yueh-hui (2020). Lê Quý Đôn’s Theory of Li-qi. Asian Studies, 8 (2): 51–77.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фуко М. Что такое Просвещение? // Интеллектуалы и власть. Т. 1. М.: Праксис, 2002. С. 335–359.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nguyễn Kim Sơn (2018). Nho học Việt Nam nửa cuối thế kỷ XVIII nửa đầu thế kỷ XIX: Mấy khuynh hướng và vấn đề [Nguyen Kim Son. Vietnamese Confucianism in the second half of the 18th century – first half of the 19th century: Some trends and problems]. Nxb. Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội. (In Vietnamese)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шестова Т.Л. Истоки и перспективы глобальной истории // Универсальная и глобальная история (эволюция Вселенной, Земли, жизни и общества). Хрестоматия. Волгоград, 2012. С. 77–82.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nguyễn Minh Tường (2009). Cuộc tiếp xúc giữa sứ thần Đại Việt Lê Quý Đôn và sứ thần Hàn Quốc Hồng Khải Hy, Triệu Vinh Tiến, Lý Huy Trung tại Bắc Kinh năm 1760 [Nguyen Minh Tuong. Contacts between Dai Viet Ambassador Le Quy Don and Korean Ambassadors Hong Gyehui, Jo Yeongjin, Lee Hwijung in Beijing in 1760]. Tạp chí Hán Nôm, 1(92): 3–17. (In Vietnamese)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Clavin P. Time, manner, place: Writing modern European history in global, transnational and international contexts // European History Quarterly. September 2010. Vol. 40. Issue 4. P. 624–640.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nikitin, A.V. (2001). Universalnyie harakteristiki traditsionnoy vietnamskoy mysli [Universal characteristics of traditional Vietnamese thought], in: Universalii vostochnyih kultur [Universals of Eastern Cultures]. Moskva. S. 244–289. (In Russian)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Conrad S. Enlightenment in Global History: A Historiographical Critique // The American Historical Review. Vol. 117. Issue 4. October 2012. P. 999–1027. DOI: 10.1093/ahr/117.4.999</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nikulin, N.I. (1977). Vietnamskaya literatura. Ot srednih vekov k novomu vremeni. X–XIX vv. [Vietnamese Literature. From the Middle Ages to the Modern Era. X–XIX centuries]. Moskva. (In Russian)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Đoàn Lê Giang. Hải quốc đồ chí của Ngụy Nguyên và ảnh hưởng của nó đến phong trào Duy tân Nhật Bản, Việt Nam [Доан Ле Зянг. «Иллюстрированный трактат о морских царствах» Вэй Юаня и его влияние на реформаторское движение в Японии и Вьетнаме] // Nhật Bản và Việt Nam trong phong trào «văn minh hóa» cuối thế kỉ XIX đầu thế kỉ XX [Япония и Вьетнам в «цивилизационном» движении конца XIX – начала XX в.]. Hà Nội: Nxb. Giáo dục, 2012. Tr.175–183. (На вьет. яз.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nikulin, N.I. (2000). Rossiyskie onimyi v kontekste otkryitiya Vietnamom Zapadnogo mira (po sochineniyam vetnamskih avtorov XVIII – nachala XIX v.) [Russian onyms in the context of Vietnam’s discovery of the Western world (based on the works of Vietnamese authors of the 18th – early 19th centuries]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie [Ethnographic Review], 5: 57–69. (In Russian)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lê Quý Đôn. Vân đài loại ngữ [Ле Куи Дон. Классифицированные речения из нетленного хранилища]. Т. I. Hà Nội, 1962. (На вьет. яз.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Novaya istoriya Vietnama. Red. S.A. Mkhitaryan [Modern history of Vietnam. Ed. S.A. Mkhitaryan] (1980). M.: Nauka. (In Russian)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lê Quý Đôn. Phủ biên tạp lục [Ле Куи Дон. Разнообразные хроники умиротворенной границы]. Hà Nội: Nxb. Khoa học Xã hội, 2007. (На вьет. яз.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Phạm Hồng Toàn (2016). Lê Quý Đôn nhà thư tịch hàng đầu Việt Nam [Pham Hong Toan. Le Quy Don аs an outstanding bibliographer of Vietnam]. Hà Nội. (In Vietnamese)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lin Yueh-hui. Lê Quý Đôn’s Theory of Li-qi // Asian Studies. 2020. Vol. 8. No. 2. P. 51–77.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pham Van Khoai (1996). Voprosyi formyi i soderjaniya traktata Le Quy Dona “Van dai loai ngu” [Questions of form and content of Le Quy Don’s treatise “Van dai loai ngu”]. Traditsionnyi Vietnam [Traditional Vietnam]. Vyp. II. Moskva. S. 216–223. (In Russian)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nguyễn Kim Sơn. Nho học Việt Nam nửa cuối thế kỷ XVIII nửa đầu thế kỷ XIX: Mấy khuynh hướng và vấn đề [Нгуен Ким Шон. Вьетнамское конфуцианство во второй половине XVIII – первой половине XIX в.: некоторые тенденции и проблемы. Nxb. Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội, 2018. (На вьет. яз.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Remarchuk, V.V., Pham Van Khoai (1996). Nekotoryie kolichestvennyie harakteristiki ieroglificheskogo teksta traktata Le Quy Dona “Van dai loai ngu” [Some quantitative characteristics of the hieroglyphic text of Le Quy Don’s treatise “Van dai loai ngu”]. Traditsionnyi Vietnam [Traditional Vietnam]. Vyp. II. Moskva. S. 224–229. (In Russian)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nguyễn Minh Tường. Cuộc tiếp xúc giữa sứ thần Đại Việt Lê Quý Đôn và sứ thần Hàn Quốc Hồng Khải Hy, Triệu Vinh Tiến, Lý Huy Trung tại Bắc Kinh năm 1760 [Нгуен Минь Тыонг. Контакты между послом Дайвьета Ле Куи Доном и послами Кореи Хон Гехи, Чо Ёнджином, Ли Хвиджуном в Пекине в 1760 г.] // Tạp chí Hán Nôm [Журнал Хан Ном]. Số 1(92) 2009. Tr. 3–17. (На вьет. яз.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shestova, T. L. (2012). Istoki i perspektivy globalnoj istorii [Origins and Prospects of Global History], in: Universalnaya i globalnaya istoriya (evolyucia Vselennoj, Zemli, zhizni i obshchestva). Hrestomatiya [Universal and global history (evolution of the Universe, Earth, life and society). Reader]. Volgograd. S. 77–82. (In Russian)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Phạm Hồng Toàn. Lê Quý Đôn nhà thư tịch hàng đầu Việt Nam [Фам Хонг Тоан. Ле Куи Дон, выдающийся библиограф Вьетнама]. Hà Nội, 2016. (На вьет. яз.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Woodside, A. (1995). Central Việt Nam's Trading World in the Eighteenth Century as Seen in Lê Qúy Đôn’s “Frontier Chronicles”, in: Essays into Vietnamese Pasts. Ithaka, New York: Cornell University Press. P. 157–172.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Woodside A. Central Việt Nam’s Trading World in the Eighteenth Century as Seen in Lê Qúy Đôn's “Frontier Chronicles” // Essays into Vietnamese Pasts. Cornell University Press, Ithaka, New York. 1995. P. 157–172.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
