Postagrogenic Transformation and Assessment of Carbon Stocks of Karelia Unused Forage Lands' Phytocenosis

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

On forage lands overgrown with vegetation of low value for agricultural production, the postagrogenic transformation of the grass cover manifested itself in a decrease in the total projective coverage up to 1.7 times (compared with hayfields 94.8–99.0%) and heterogeneity of the species composition. The coefficients of floral similarity of haymaking Jacquard and forage lands with the curtin type of overgrowth averaged 0.45, and with the solid type – 0.39. Grass-cereal or cereal-grass stands were mainly composed of rhizomatous and turf-bearing plant species. The reserves of absolutely dry aboveground mass (4.86 t/ha) and carbon (2.04 t C/ha) of hayfields significantly exceeded (up to 1.5 times) the corresponding indicators of unused forage lands.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

O. Bakhmet

Karelian Scientific Center of the RAS

Email: levstratova@yandex.ru

Corresponding Member of the RAS

俄罗斯联邦, Petrozavodsk

L. Evstratova

Karelian Scientific Center of the RAS

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: levstratova@yandex.ru

Grand PhD in Agricultural Sciences, Professor

俄罗斯联邦, Petrozavodsk

E. Nikolaeva

Karelian Scientific Center of the RAS

Email: levstratova@yandex.ru

PhD in Agricultural Sciences

俄罗斯联邦, Petrozavodsk

E. Dubina-Chekhovich

Karelian Scientific Center of the RAS

Email: levstratova@yandex.ru

PhD in Biological Sciences

俄罗斯联邦, Petrozavodsk

参考

  1. Bakhmet O.N., Evstratova L.P., Nikolaeva E.V. i dr. Ocenka rastitel’nogo pokrova pri analize byudzheta ugleroda v agrolandshaftah Karelii // Vestnik rossijskoj sel’skohozyajstvennoj nauki. 2023. № 6. S. 55–60.
  2. Vakhrusheva V.V., Pryadil’shchikova E.N., Stolyarchuk E.I. Produktivnost’ i pitatel’naya cennost’ pastbishchnyh agrofitocenozov na osnove zlakovyh i bobovyh trav // Molochnohozyajstvennyj vestnik. 2021. № 2 (42). S. 31–40.
  3. Dospekhov B.A. Metodika polevogo opyta. M.: Agropromizdat, 1985. 351 s.
  4. Mishina Z.A., Surova T.S. K voprosu o prichinah snizheniya plodorodiya pochvy zemel’ sel’skohozyajstvennogo naznacheniya // Azimut nauchnyh issledovanij: ekonomika i upravlenie. 2020. T. 9. № 3 (32). S. 349–353.
  5. Megarran E. Ekologicheskoe raznoobrazie i ego izmerenie. M.: Mir, 1992. 184 s.
  6. Pristova T.A. Soderzhanie ugleroda v rasteniyah srednetaezhnyh listvennyh fitocenozov Respubliki Komi // Principy ekologii. 2022. № 3. S. 43–49. https://doi.org/ 10.15393/j1.art.2022.12402.
  7. Telesnina V.M. Dinamika svojstv pochv vo vzaimosvyazi s rastitel’nost’yu pri estestvennom postagrogennom zarastanii senokosov (Kostromskaya oblast’) // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 17. Pochvovedenie. 2021. № 2. S. 18–28.
  8. Ufimceva M.D. Indikatornaya rol’ rastitel’nosti pri ekologicheskih issledovaniyah [Elektronnyj resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.eco.nw.ru/lib/data/10/07/020710.htm (Data obrashcheniya 25.09.2024).
  9. Kalinina O., Goryachkin S.V., Lyuri D.I., Giani L. Postagrogenic development of vegetation, soils and carbon stocks under self-restoration in different climatic zones of European Russia // Catena. 2015. V. 129. P. 18–29.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名 4.0国际许可协议的许可