Effect of Grain Size and Texture of Polycrystalline Tungsten on Ion-Beam Sputtering

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The effect of grain size and texture of polycrystalline tungsten on the sputtering yield and surface morphology under high-dose irradiation with 30 keV Ar+ ions has been studied. Samples with an average grain size from 300 nm to 7 μm, without texture and with a [001] texture have been used in the experiment. It is shown that the ion-induced surface morphology strongly depends on the grain size and irradiation fluence. The grain size has little (less than 10%) effect on the sputtering yield, while the texture can reduce the sputtering yield by a factor of two. An experiment with varying the angle has shown that the channeling effect is the reason for the two-fold decrease in the sputtering yield for textured samples. The influence of the surface relief on the sputtering yield has been analyzed. An expression taking into account atomic redeposition and ion reflection is proposed to predict the sputtering yield of a surface with ion-induced relief.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

R. Khisamov

Institute for Metals Superplasticity Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: r.khisamov@mail.ru
Ресей, Ufa

N. Andrianova

Lomonosov Moscow State University; Moscow Aviation Institute

Email: r.khisamov@mail.ru
Ресей, Moscow; Moscow

A. Borisov

Institute for Metals Superplasticity Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Lomonosov Moscow State University; Moscow Aviation Institute

Email: r.khisamov@mail.ru
Ресей, Ufa; Moscow; Moscow

M. Ovchinnikov

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: r.khisamov@mail.ru
Ресей, Moscow

R. Mulyukov

Institute for Metals Superplasticity Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: r.khisamov@mail.ru
Ресей, Ufa

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Guseva M.I., Martynenko Yu.V. // Sov. Phys. Usp. 1981. V. 24. P. 996. https://doi.org/10.1070/PU1981v024n12ABEH004758
  2. Martynenko Yu.V., Nagel M.Yu. // Plasma Phys. Rep. 2012. V. 38. P. 996. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063780X12110074
  3. Kajita S., Kawaguchi S., Ohno N., Yoshida N. // Sci. Rep. 2018. V. 8. Р. 56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18476-7
  4. Harutyunyan Z.R., Ogorodnikova O.V., Aksenova A.S., Gasparyan Yu.M., Efimov V.S., Kharkov M.M., Kaziev A.V., Volkov N.V. // J. Surf. Invest: X-Ray, Synchrotron Neutron Tech. 2020. V. 14. № 6. P 1248. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1027451020060245
  5. Budaev V.P., Fedorovich S.D., Dedov A.V., Karpov A.V., Martynenko Yu.V., Kavyrshin D.I., Gubkin M.K., Lukashevsky M.V., Lazukin A.V., Zakharenkov A.V., Sliva A.P., Marchenkov A.Yu., Budaeva M.V., Tran Q.V., Rogozin K.A., Konkov A.A., Vasilyev G.B., Burmistrov D.A., Belousov S.V. // Plasma Discharge. Fusion Sci. Technol. 2023. V. 79. Iss. 4. P. 404. https://doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2022.2118471
  6. Efe M., El-Atwani O., Guo Y, Klenosky D.R. // Scr. Mater. 2014. V. 70. P. 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.08.013
  7. El-Atwani O., Hattar K., Hinks J.A., Greaves G., Harilal S.S., Hassanein A. // J. Nucl. Mater. 2015. V. 458. P. 216. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.12.095
  8. Chen Z., Niu L-L., Wang Z., Tian L., Kecskes L, Zhu K., Wei Q. // Acta Mater. 2018. V. 147. P. 100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.01.015
  9. Wu Y-C., Hou Q-Q., Luo L-M., Zan X., Zhu X-Y., Li P., Xu Q., Cheng J-G., Luo G-N., Chen J-L. // J. Alloys Compd. 2019. V. 779. P. 926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.11.279
  10. El-Atwani O., Cunningham W.S., Perez D., Martinez E., Trelewicz J.R., Li M., Maloy S.A. // Scr. Mater. 2020. V. 180. P. 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.01.013
  11. Qian W., Wei R., Zhang M., Chen P., Wang L., Liu X., Chen J., Ni W., Zheng P. // Mater. Lett. 2022. V. 308. P. 130921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2021.130921
  12. Wurmshuber M., Doppermann S., Wurster S., Jakob S., Balooch M., Alfreider M., Schmuck K., Bodlos R., Romaner L., Hosemann P., Clemens H., Maier-Kiener V., Kiener D. // Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2023. V. 111. P. 106125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2023.106125
  13. Michaluk C.A. // J. Electron. Mater. 2002. V. 31. P. 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-002-0165-9
  14. Voitsenya V.S., Balden M., Bardamid A.F., Bondarenko V.N., Davis J.W., Konovalov V.G., Ryzhkov I.V., Skoryk O.O., Solodovchenko S.I., Zhang-jian Z. // Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B. 2013. V. 302. P. 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2013.03.005
  15. Yang W., Zhao G., Wang Y., Wang S., Zhan S., Wang D., Bao M., Tang B., Yao L., Wang X. // J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 2021. V. 32. P. 26181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-021-06645-4
  16. Andrianova N.N., Borisov A.M., Ovchinnikov M.A., Khisamov R.Kh., Mulyukov R.R. // J. Surf. Invest.: X-Ray, Synchrotron Neutron Tech. 2024. V. 18. P. 305. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1027451024020046
  17. Andrianova N.N., Borisov A.M., Ovchinnikov M.A., Khisamov R.Kh, Mulyukov R.R. // Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys. 2024. V. 88. P. 478. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062873823706141
  18. Mulyukov R.R. // J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B. 2006. V. 24. P. 1061. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.2174024
  19. Zhang Y., Ganeev A.V., Wang J.T., Liu J.Q., Alexandrov I.V. // Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2009. V. 503. P. 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2008.07.074
  20. Németh A.A.N., Reiser J., Armstrong D.E.J., Rieth M. // Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2015. V. 50. P. 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2014.11.005
  21. Bonnekoh C., Lied P., Pantleon W., Karcher T., Leiste H., Hoffmann A., Reiser J., Rieth M. // Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2020. V. 93. P. 105347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2020.105347
  22. Oh Y., Ko W.-S., Kwak N., Jang J., Ohmura T., Han H.N. // J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022. V. 105. P. 242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2021.07.024
  23. Khisamov R.Kh., Andrianova A.A., Borisov A.M., Ovchinnikov M.A., Timiryaev R.R., Musabirov I.I., Mulyukov R.R. // Phys. At. Nucl. 2023. V. 86. № 10. P. 2198. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778823100228
  24. Markushev M.V., Avtokratova E.V., Krymskiy S.V., Tereshkin V.V., Sitdikov O.Sh. // Lett. Mater. 2022. V. 12. Iss. 4s. P. 463. https://doi.org/10.22226/2410-3535-2022-4-463-468
  25. Yusupova N.R., Krylova K.A., Mulyukov R.R. // Lett. Mater. 2023. V. 13. Iss. 3. P. 255. https://doi.org/10.22226/2410-3535-2023-3-255-259
  26. Mulyukov R.R., Khisamov R.Kh., Borisov A.M., Baimiev A.Kh., Ovchinnikov M.A., Timiryaev R.R., Vladimirova A.A. // Lett. Mater. 2023. V. 13. Iss. 4. P. 373. https://doi.org/10.22226/2410-3535-2023-4-373-376
  27. Xue K., Guo Y., Zhou Y., Xu B., Li P. // Int. J. Refr. Met. Hard Mater. 2021. V. 94. P. 105377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2020.105377
  28. Mashkova E.S., Molchanov V.A. Medium-Energy Ion Reflection from Solids. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1985. 444 p.
  29. Ziegler J.F., Biersack J.P. SRIM, 2013. http://www.srim.org
  30. Sun M., Ding C., Xu J., Shan D., Guo B., Langdon T.G. // Crystals. 2023. V. 13. P. 887. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13060887
  31. Bradley R.M., Harper J.M.E. // J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A. 1988. V. 6. P. 2390. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.575561
  32. Chan W.L., Chason E. // J. Appl. Phys. 2007. V. 101. P. 121301. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2749198
  33. Littmark U., Hofer W.O. // J. Mater. Sci. 1978. V. 13. P. 2577. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00552687
  34. Kustner M., Eckstein W., Dose V., Roth J. // Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B. 1998. V. 145. P. 320. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-583X(98)00399-1
  35. Makeev M.A., Barabasi A.-L. // Nucl. Instrum. Methods Physics. Res. B. 2004. V. 222. P. 316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2004.02.027.
  36. Stadlmayr R., Szabo P.S., Berger B.M., Cupak C., Chiba R., Blöch D., Mayer D., Stechauner B., Sauer M., Foelske-Schmitz A., Oberkofler M., Schwarz-Selinger T., Mutzke A., Aumayr F. // Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B. 2018. V. 430. P. 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2018.06.004
  37. Shulga V.I. // J. Surf. Invest.: X-Ray, Synchrotron Neutron Tech. 2020. V. 14. P. 1346. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1027451020060440
  38. Borisov A.M., Mashkova E.S., Ovchinnikov M.A., Khisamov R.K., Mulyukov R.R. // J. Surf. Invest.: X-Ray, Synchrotron Neutron Tech. 2021. V. 15. P. S66. https://doi.org/10.31857/S1028096022030062
  39. Borisov A.M., Mashkova E.S., Ovchinnikov M.A., Khisamov R.K., Mulyukov R.R. // Tech. Phys. Lett. 2022. V. 48. Iss. 6. P. 55. https://doi.org/10.21883/TPL.2022.06.53792.19146
  40. Bradley R.M., Hobler G. // J. Appl. Phys. 2023. V. 133. P. 065303. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0137324
  41. Kwon T.H., Park S., Ha J.M., Youn Y-S. // Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2021. V. 53. Iss. 6. P. 1939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.12.024
  42. Shermukhamedov S., Probst M. // Phys. Plasmas. 2023. V. 30. P. 123901. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0167840
  43. Cupak C., Szabo P.S., Biber H., Stadlmayr R., Grave C., Fellinger M., Brötzner J., Wilhelm R.A., Möller W., Mutzke A., Moro M.V., Aumayr F. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021. V. 570. P. 151204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151204
  44. Szabo P.S., Cupak C., Biber H., Jaggi N., Galli A., Wurz P., Aumayr F. // Surf. Interfaces. 2022. V. 30. P. 101924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2022.101924
  45. Diddens C., Linz S.J. // Eur. Phys. J. B. 2015. V. 88. P. 190. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2015-60468-7
  46. Behrisch R., Eckstein W. Sputtering by Particle Bombardment. Heidelberg–Berlin: Springer–Verlag, 2007. 509 p. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-44502-9
  47. Matsunami N., Yamamura Y., Itikawa Y., Itoh N., Kazumata Y., Miyagawa S., Morita K., Shimizu R., Tawara H. // At. Data Nucl. Data Tables. 1984. V. 31. Iss. 1. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-640X(84)90016-0
  48. Mikhailov V.S., Babenko P.Yu., Shergin A.P., Zinoviev A.N. // Plasma Phys. Rep. 2024. V. 50. Iss. 1. P. 23. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063780X23601682
  49. Mahne N., Čekada M., Panjan M. // Coatings. 2022. V. 12. P. 1541. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12101541
  50. Carter G. // J. Phys. D. 2001. V. 34. P. R1. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/34/3/201
  51. Behrisch R. Sputtering by Particle Bombardment I. Berlin–Heidelberg–New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981. 281 p.
  52. Vantomme A. // Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B. 2016. V. 371. P. 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2015.11.035
  53. Nagasaki T., Hirai H., Yoshino M., Yamada T. // Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B. 2018. V. 418. P. 34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2017.12.023
  54. Eckstein W., Mashkova E.S., Molchanov V.A., Sidorov A.V., Zhukova Yu.N. // Appl. Phys. A. 1993. V. 57. P. 271. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00332602

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу
2. Fig. 1. SEM images obtained in the reflected electron diffraction mode of fine-grained (sheet) (a, b) and ultrafine-grained (high-pressure torsion) (c, d) tungsten samples of initial (a, c) and after annealing at 1400 (b) and 1500°C (d).

Жүктеу (473KB)
Метадеректер
3. Table 1_Fig. 1

Жүктеу (19KB)
Метадеректер
4. Table 1_Fig. 2

Жүктеу (23KB)
Метадеректер
5. Table 1_Fig. 3

Жүктеу (23KB)
Метадеректер
6. Table 1_Fig. 4

Жүктеу (20KB)
Метадеректер
7. Fig. 2. SEM images of the surface of fine-grained (sheet) (a, b) and ultrafine-grained (high-pressure torsion) (c, d) tungsten samples of initial (a, c) and after annealing at 1400 (b) and 1500°C (d), after irradiation with Ar+ ions with energy 30 keV, fluence 9 × 1018 cm-2. The imaging angle is 45°.

Жүктеу (790KB)
Метадеректер
8. Fig. 3. Dependences of mass change Δm on irradiation fluence F (a) and sputtering coefficient Y on sputtering layer thickness Δx (b) of fine (sheet) (1, 2) and ultrafine (high-pressure torsion) (3, 4) tungsten samples of initial (1, 3) and after annealing at 140 (2) and 1500°C (4), after irradiation with Ar+ ions with 30 keV energy. Normal ion drop, target temperature not higher than 50°C.

Жүктеу (153KB)
Метадеректер
9. Fig. 4. Tilt angles of cones on the surface of ultrafine-grained (high-pressure torsion) (a) and fine-grained (sheet) tungsten (b), as well as characteristic SEM images of these samples after annealing at 140 and 1500°C (c) (imaging angle 45°), respectively, under irradiation with 30 keV Ar+ ions. Distribution of slope angles θ for initial ultrafine-grained (high-pressure torsion) (1) and annealed at 1500°C (2) tungsten samples (d). The inset shows a schematic representation of the cone.

Жүктеу (341KB)
Метадеректер
10. Fig. 5. Dependence of the Y coefficient on the inclination angle θ for a single cone Y (θ) (1) and cone-shaped relief Үk (θ) (2) on the tungsten surface when trained by Ar+ ions with 30 keV energy at normal ion incidence.

Жүктеу (89KB)
Метадеректер
11. Fig. 6. Sputtering coefficient Y as a function of tilt angle for a fine-grained (sheet) tungsten sample with [001] grain texture when trained with 30 keV Ar+ ions (1), and an ultrafine-grained (high-pressure torsion) sample (2).

Жүктеу (70KB)
Метадеректер

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025