The evolution of the legal practice of collecting the cost of goods, works, services in the absence of a state (municipal) contract

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

The article is a study of judicial practice on the issue of recovery of unjustified enrichment by private entities (suppliers, contractors, performers) from state (municipal) customers in the absence of a concluded state (municipal) contract provided for by the legislation on the contract system.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Albert Trofimov

St. Petersburg State University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: albert.trofimov@gmail.com

PhD in Law, Assistant of the Department of Administrative and Financial Law, Faculty of Law

俄罗斯联邦, St. Petersburg

参考

  1. Kikavets V. V. The legal form of financial support for public procurement // State and Law. 2022. No. 3. Pp. 89–98 (in Russ.).
  2. Kovalkova E. Yu. On the issue of recovery of the cost of goods delivered, works performed, services rendered in the absence of a state (municipal) contract // Scientific notes of the Kazan branch of the Russian State Unitary Enterprise. 2017. Vol. 13. Pp. 192–203 (in Russ.).

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024