Measures of social support for labor veterans: features of the protection of rights upon appointment and loss

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

The article examines the problems of theory and practice that arise in connection with the incorrect application of legislation on veterans, incorrect interpretation of the rules defining measures of social support for citizens who have a special legal status – “Veteran of Labor”. As a result of improper law enforcement, if a labor veteran changes his place of residence, he loses the right to receive social benefits not only of regional significance, but also federal ones, paid on the basis of his existing status.

Social protection bodies of the population of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, when determining the grounds and procedure for assigning appropriate payments to a labor veteran, take into account not the status of such a citizen, which meets the requirements of federal law, but take into account the territorial principle, determining support measures at the place of residence of such a person, which leads to a violation their legal rights. As a result, social security authorities are filing claims for the recovery of amounts paid to the labor veteran as measures of social support under the rules of unjust enrichment, considering that their receipt is illegal due to a change in his place of residence. It is substantiated that the enforcement of the relevant norms should take into account the different purposes of the corresponding social support measures, the financial support of which relates to the expenditure obligations of not only the Russian Federation, but also its constituent entities.

The author has proven that social support measures apply to all labor veterans, regardless of their place of residence, which meets the requirements of the legislation on veterans and the essence of the state’s social policy.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Natalia Letova

Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: letovanv@mail.ru

Doctor of Law, Chief Researcher at the Procedural Law Sector

Rússia, 10, Znamenka St., Moscow, 119019

Bibliografia

  1. Velichko M. B. Analysis of some examples of the application by courts of general jurisdiction of the principles of legality and trust of citizens and their associations to the law and state actions in resolving disputes about property consequences related to decisions of public authorities // Herald of the Civil Procedure. 2023. No. 2. Pp. 51–74 (in Russ.).
  2. Vitushko V. A. Legal foundations of the social market. Minsk, 2017. P. 4 (in Russ.).
  3. Dyugi L. Social Law, individual law and the transformation of the state. M., 1909. Pp. 20–22 (in Russ.).
  4. Dyukova E. A., Chepurnova N. M. Judicial control as a type of state control activity // Russ. Judge. 2007. No. 10. P. 17 (in Russ.).
  5. Zhukov V. I. Socio-demographic ALARM. M., 2017 (in Russ.).
  6. Kavelin K. D. Selected works on Civil Law. M., 2003. Pp. 66, 74, 189 (in Russ.).
  7. Kryazhkov A. V. Public interest: concept, types and protection // State and Law. 1999. No. 10. P. 94 (in Russ.).
  8. Lebedev V. M. Formation and development of judicial power in the Russian Federation. M., 2000. P. 18 (in Russ.).
  9. Letova N. V., Mikhailova E. V., Solovyanenko N. I., Chucha S. Yu. Judicial and non-judicial protection of civil, family and labor rights in the context of globalization and digitalization of the state and society // State and Law. 2022. No. 9. Pp. 66–74 (in Russ.).
  10. Pokrovsky I. A. The main problems of Civil Law. M., 2001. P. 25 (in Russ.).
  11. Popondopulo V. F. Law of obligations: social foundations and concept // Problems of Civil Law and Process: collection of scientific articles. Grodno, 2021. Iss. 6. P. 143 (in Russ.).
  12. Prosvanchenkov A. V., Shakhbazov R. A. The formation of the institution of abuse of law in Russia and modern legal systems // Leningrad legal journal. 2017. No. 1 (47). P. 86 (in Russ.).
  13. Reshetnikova I. V. Theory of procedural risk // Law. 2012. No. 6. P. 117 (in Russ.).
  14. Savenkov A. N. The state and law during the crisis of modern civilization. M., 2020 (in Russ.).
  15. Savenkov A. N., Zhukov V. I. Sociology of legal deviations and social addictions. M., 2019 (in Russ.).
  16. Social Civil Law in its fundamental institutions: collective / ed. by K. M. Nekrashevich. M., 2022 (in Russ.).
  17. Syrykh V. M. Theory of the state and law: textbook. M., 2001 (in Russ.).
  18. Tikhomirov Yu. A. Public law. M., 1995. Pp. 30, 48, 55 (in Russ.).
  19. Fomenko E. Civil proceedings in the system of types of legal proceedings // Justice of the Peace. 2009. No. 4. P. 26 (in Russ.).
  20. Charyev M. R. Judicial power in the system of ensuring state security of the Russian Federation // Russ. Judge. 2006. No. 3. P. 8 (in Russ.).
  21. Chucha S. Yu. The constitutional principle of respect for a person of labor: problems of implementation in Russian legislation and law enforcement practice // Herald of Tomsk State University. Law. 2022. No. 44. Pp. 159–171 (in Russ.).
  22. Yudin A. V. The category “risk” in civil proceedings // Herald of Civil Procedure. 2014. No. 5. P. 11 (in Russ.).
  23. Congost R., Gelman J., Santos R. Property Rights in Land: Issues in social, economic and global history. 2019. P. 180.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025