On the question of fixing the national-language composition of the population in the All-Russian population census 2020–2021

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The article carries out a critical analysis of the quality of the results of the questions of the 2020–2021 Russian population census on nationality, native language, knowledge of Russian and other languages, and language use. The study reveals the uneven distribution of “non-answers” by regions, between urban and rural areas, and age groups. The interpretation of the published census results is hampered by the quality of answers, lack of distinction between non-answers and negative answers to questions, and questionable grouping of nationalities and languages. Therefore, it is not possible to use the results of Russian language proficiency and knowledge of other languages in several of Russia’s federal subjects. The situation is aggravated by a sharp increase in the number of non-responses to the questions on nationality and language in the 2020–2021 census compared to the previous censuses. This hinders the analysis of these questions of the 2020–2021 census and the understanding of the dynamics of national and language processes in Russia using census statistics.

The article reveals foreign experiences of conducting censuses and statistical survey of the national and linguistic sphere. Many countries resort to various methods (including the use of surveys as a source of census), ways of assessing national, cultural affiliation, knowledge and proficiency of languages, ensuring the efficiency of fieldwork, and evaluating the quality of census data. They pay more attention to the methodological support of the national and language block of the census.

The authors call for a balanced use of the results of the national and language issues of the 2020– 2021 Russian population census in research work and in decision-making in the government national policy, since national and language relations in Russia are very sensitive for the country’s numerous ethnic communities.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Gulnara F. Gabdrakhmanova

Institute of History named after Sh. Mardjani

Author for correspondence.
Email: medi54375@mail.ru

Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Head of the Department of Ethnology

Russian Federation, Kazan

Hèctor Alòs i Font

University of Barcelona

Email: hectoralos@gmail.com

External Collaborator, Center for Sociolinguistics and Communication Research

Spain, Barcelona, Catalonia

References

  1. Anderson B. (2006) Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London; New York.
  2. Andreev E. M. (2012) On the accuracy of the results of Russian population censuses and the degree of trust in various sources of information. Voprosy statistiki [Bulletin of Statistics]. No. 11: 21–35. (In Russ.)
  3. Bernard B., King T., Valente P. (2013) The Modern Census: Evolution, Examples and Evaluation. International Statistical Review. No. 81. doi: 10.1111/insr.12036.
  4. Bogoyavlensky D. (2012) Census 2010: ethnic profile. Demoscop Weekly [Demoscope Weekly]. No. 531– 532. URL: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2012/0531/demoscope531.pdf (accessed 20.05.2023). (In Russ.)
  5. Borisovich K.Yu. (2017) Languages of Moscow according to the 2010 census. Rodnoy Yazyk [Mother Tongue]. Vol. 7. No. 2: 24–44. (In Russ.)
  6. Drobizheva L. M., Ryzhova S. V. (2015) Civic and ethnic identity and perception of the preferable state in Russia. POLIS. Politicheskie issledovaniya [POLIS. Political Studies]. No. 5: 9–24. (In Russ.)
  7. Ethnography of the census – 2002. (2003) Ed. by E. Filippova, D. Arel, K. Gusef. Moscow: Aviaizdat.
  8. Farahutdinov Sh.F., Hajrullina N. G. (2022) All-russian population census 2020–2021: censusists’ point of view. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 10: 66–73. (In Russ.)
  9. Iskhakov D. M. (2002) A look at the All-Russian census from Tatarstan (In response to the article by Sokolovsky S. V. “The Tatar problem” in the All-Russian population census). Ab Imperio [Ab Imperio]. No. 4: 235–249. (In Russ.)
  10. Juran S., Pistiner A. (2016) The 2010 Round of Population and Housing Censuses (2005–2014). Statistical Journal of the IAOS. Vol. 33. No. 2: 399–406. doi: 10.3233/SJI-160282.
  11. Kitchin R. (2017) Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shift. Sociologiya: 4M [Sociology: 4M]. No. 44: 111–152. (In Russ.)
  12. Krasnopol’skaya I., Solodova G. (2016) National census as an instrument of nation building in the postindustrial age. Mir Rossii [Universe of Russia]. Vol. 25. No. 1: 55–78. (In Russ.)
  13. Mokin K. S., Baryshnaya N. A. (2022) Population census as a form of fixing territorial identity in youth assessments. Vestnik Povolzhskogo In-ta upravleniya [Bulletin of the Volga Institute of Management]. Vol. 22. No. 2: 62–72. (In Russ.)
  14. Myagkov A.Yu., Zhuravleva S. L. (2011) Experimental assessment of data quality in a telephone interview. Sociologiya: 4M [Sociology: 4M]. No. 32: 26–52. (In Russ.)
  15. Polyan P. (2004) Preparation, conduct and some qualitative results of the 2002 All-Russian population census. Demoscop Weekly [Demoscope Weekly]. No. 155–156. URL: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2004/0155/analit01.php (accessed 20.04.2023). (In Russ.)
  16. Social and national. Experience of ethno-sociological research based on the materials of the Tatar ASSR. (1972) Yu. V. Harutyunyan (ed). Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
  17. Social inequality of ethnic groups: ideas and reality. (2002) Ed. by L. M. Drobizheva. Moscow: Academia. (In Russ.)
  18. Stepanov V. V. (2001) Russian Census 2002: Ways of Measuring the Identity of Large and Small Groups. Issledovaniya po prikladnoj i neotlozhnoj etnologii [Studies in Applied and Urgent Ethnology]. No. 145. Moscow: IEA RAN. (In Russ.)
  19. Tishkov V. A. (2003) Population censuses and identity construction. In: On the way to the census. Moscow: Aviaizdat: 9–38. (In Russ.)
  20. Treviño Maruri R., Domingo A. (2020) ¿Adiós al censo en España? Elementos para el debate / Goodbye to the Spanish Census? Elements for Consideration. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas. No. 171: 107–124. doi: 10.5477/cis/reis.171.107.
  21. Varshaver E. A. (2022) Trapped in Double-Irrelevancy: (Re)-Production of Ethnicity in Interactions between Census-Takers and Their Respondents Based on Results of Observations during 2021 All-Russian Census in Dagestan. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i social’nye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes]. No. 4: 199–221. doi: 10.14515/monitoring.2022.4.2150. (In Russ.)
  22. Zakharov S. V., Vishnevsky A. G. (2010) What does Russian demographic statistics know and what does it not know. Voprosy statistiki [Bulletin of Statistics]. No. 2: 7–17. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences