<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Novaya i Novejshaya Istoriya</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Novaya i Novejshaya Istoriya</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Новая и новейшая история</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0130-3864</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">The Russian Academy of Sciences</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">699089</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7868/S3034543X25060047</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Modern history</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Новое время</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">The Tenassur Incidents in Ottoman and Russian Accounts: The Trabzon Case</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>ФЕНОМЕН «ТЕННАСУРА» В ОСМАНСКИХ И РОССИЙСКИХ ИСТОЧНИКАХ: КЕЙС ТРАПЕЗУНДА</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4702-9778</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="scopus">57207741547</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="researcherid">ABA-2894-2020</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kaplan Kezban</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Каплан Кезбан</surname><given-names>А.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio><p>доктор исторических наук, профессор кафедры истории факультета искусств и наук</p></bio><email>kacar45@yahoo.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0660-6508</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="scopus">57202778122</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="researcherid">J-1238-2018</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Mirzekhanov</surname><given-names>V. S</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Мирзеханов</surname><given-names>В. С</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio><p>доктор исторических наук, главный научный сотрудник</p></bio><email>lum62@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Manisa Celal Bayar University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Университет Манис Джелал Баяр</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Institute of World History, Russian Academy of Sciences</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Институт всеобщей истории РАН</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2025-12-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>12</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><issue>6</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">NO6 (2025)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">№6 (2025)</issue-title><fpage>60</fpage><lpage>71</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-12-23"><day>23</day><month>12</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2025, Russian Academy of Sciences</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2025, Российская академия наук</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Russian Academy of Sciences</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Российская академия наук</copyright-holder></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://vietnamjournal.ru/0130-3864/article/view/699089">https://vietnamjournal.ru/0130-3864/article/view/699089</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This article investigates the phenomenon of tenassur — the reconversion of former Christian converts to Islam back to Christianity — through a focused case study of the Istavris community in the province of Trabzon during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Drawing upon previously unused Russian consular reports alongside Ottoman archival sources, it offers a comparative and multi-perspectival account of these contested religious identities. While earlier scholarship has highlighted hidden Christian practices and local strategies of dissimulation, this study demonstrates that the Istavris’ public declarations of Christianity were shaped not only by the Tanzimat and Reform Edicts, which proclaimed religious equality, but also by the fiscal and military burdens imposed on Ottoman subjects. Their attempts to secure exemption from conscription by reclaiming Christian status provoked divergent responses from civil and military authorities, ranging from cautious tolerance to coercive repression. The analysis further reveals how foreign consular interventions, particularly by Russian officials, complicated Ottoman governance of these populations. By situating tenassur incidents at the intersection of law, religion, diplomacy, and military policy, the article underscores the tension between imperial reformist ideals and the pragmatic imperatives of state control. In so doing, it contributes new evidence and perspectives to debates on conversion, identity, and state-society relations in the late Ottoman Empire.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>В статье исследуется феномен «тенассура» (tenassur) — перехода бывших христианских конвертитов из ислама обратно в христианство — на примере общины «истарги» (istavris) в провинции Трапезунд в конце XIX — начале XX в. Опираясь на ранее не использовавшиеся российские консульские донесения и османские архивные материалы, авторы предлагают сравнительное и многоперспективное рассмотрение этих «оспариваемых религиозных идентичностей». Если прежняя историография акцентировала внимание на скрытых христианских практиках и локальных стратегиях диссимуляции, то в данном исследовании показано, что публичные декларации христианской принадлежности со стороны «истарги» определялись не только реформистскими декретами танзимата, провозгласившими религиозное равенство, но и тяжестью налоговых и воинских повинностей, возлагавшихся на подданных Османской империи. Их попытки добиться освобождения от военной службы путем возвращения в христианство вызывали различные реакции со стороны гражданских и военных властей — от сдержанной терпимости до репрессий. Анализ источников также свидетельствует, что вмешательство иностранных консульств, особенно российского, осложняло управление этими группами в Османской империи. Рассматривая феномен «тенассура» на пересечении права, религии, дипломатии и военной политики, статья выявляет противоречия между реформаторскими идеалами империи и прагматическими задачами государственного контроля. Тем самым работа открывает новые перспективы в дискуссии о прозапитизме, идентичности и взаимоотношениях государства и общества в позднеосманский период.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>tenassur</kwd><kwd>conversion</kwd><kwd>Ottoman Empire</kwd><kwd>Trabzon</kwd><kwd>Istavris community</kwd><kwd>religious identity</kwd><kwd>military conscription</kwd><kwd>Tanzimat reforms</kwd><kwd>Russian consular reports</kwd><kwd>state-society relations</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>«тенассур»</kwd><kwd>обращение (конверсия)</kwd><kwd>Османская империя</kwd><kwd>Трапезунд</kwd><kwd>«истарги»</kwd><kwd>религиозная идентичность</kwd><kwd>воинская повинность</kwd><kwd>реформы танзимата</kwd><kwd>российские консульские донесения</kwd><kwd>государственно-общественные отношения</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Берг Н.В. Записки об осаде Севастополя, с двумя планами: в 2-х т. Т. 1. М., 1858.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Berg N.V. Notes on the Siege of Sevastopol, with Two Plans: in 2 vols. Vol. 1. Moscow, 1858. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Aslan H. Tanzimat Döneminde Dinî Değişim Halleri: İhtida-Gizli Din-Tanassur Ve Osmanlı // Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi. 2012. Cilt 6. Sayi 12. S. 55–82.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Avcı M. Osmanlı Hukukunda Suçlar ve Cezalar. İstanbul, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Ayaydın R. Osmanlı Devleti’nde Askeri Yükümlülükler ve Muafiyetler (1826–1914): Yüksek lisans tezi. İstanbul, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Bijişkyan M. Karadeniz Kıyıları Tarih ve Coğrafyası 1817–1819 / Ermen. şev. H.D. Andreasyan. İstanbul, 1969.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Bilgin M. Trabzon Vilayetinde İki Din Taşıyanlar: Yüksek lisans tezi. İstanbul, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Deringil S. The Well-Protected Domains. Ideology and the Legitimation of Power in the Ottoman Empire, 1876–1909. London; New York, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Gülsoy U. Cizyeden Vatandaşlığa Osmanlı’nın Gayrimüslim Askerleri. İstanbul, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Janin R. Musulmans malgré eux, les İstavriotes // Revue des études Byzantines. 1912. № 97. P. 495–505.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Jelavich B. Russia’s Balkan Entanglements, 1806–1914. Cambridge; New York, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Kandil I., Karagöz M. Birinci Dünya Savaşı’nda Osmanlı Ordusunda Bedel-i Nakdî Uygulamaları // Harp Tarihi Dergisi. 2021. Sayı 4. S. 39–73.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Onar S.S. Bedel-i Askeri // İslam Ansiklopedisi: 44 ciltte. С. 2. İstanbul, 1979. S. 439–440.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Ortayli I. Tanzimat Döneminde Tanassur ve Din Değiştirme Olayları // Tanzimat’in 150. Yıldönümü Uluslararası Sempozyumu. Ankara, 1994. S. 481–487.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Özgören A. İki Din Taşıyan İstavriler ve Propaganda // Karadeniz Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2019. Cilt 5. Sayi 8. S. 153–174.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Sağlam F. Son Dönem Osmanlı Gelir Kaynaklarının Cumhuriyet Dönemi Gelir Kaynaklarıyla Mukayesesi: Doktora tezi. İstanbul, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Sevket Ş. Trabzon Tarihi / yayına hazırlayan İ. Hacıfettahoğlu. Trabzon, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Skendi S. Crypto-Christianity in the Balkan Area under the Ottomans // Slavic Review. 1967. Vol. 26. № 2. P. 227–246.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Smith E. Researches of the Rev. E. Smith And Rev. H.G.O. Dwight in Armenia: Including a Journey through Asia Minor and into Georgia and Persia, with a Visit to the Nestorian and Chaldean Christians of Oormiah and Salmas: in 2 vols. Vol. 2. Boston; New York, 1833.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Türkan A. Tanzimat’tan Sonra Osmanlı Devleti’nde Tanassur Olayları ve Akdağmadeni’ndeki Gizli Hristiyan İstavrîler // Türk-İslâm Medeniyeti Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi. 2010. Sayi 10. S. 141–174.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Zürcher E.-J. Devletin Silahlanması. Ortadoğu’da ve Orta Asya’da Zorunlu Askerlik (1775–1925). İstanbul, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
