Reproductive parameters and sex cell ultrastructure in cinnabar goatfish Parupeneus heptacanthus (Mullidae) from the coastal zone of Nha Trang (Vietnam)

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The size composition of the fish, gonadal condition, and oocyte and spermatozoon ultrastructure are studied in Parupeneus heptacanthus from the coastal zone of Nha Trang (southern Central Vietnam). The males are larger than the females, and the body length—body weight relationship is significantly different in the representatives of both sexes. Based on ovarian condition, oogenesis is continuous. Average batch fecundity is 11 056 oocytes. The egg envelope in the end of vitellogenesis (~300 µm in diameter) includes zona radiata 5.0 µm in width and chorion (0.5 µm). Based on spermatozoon head ultrastructure, the species is similar to other species of the genus Parupeneus, but the flagellum is substantially longer reaching on average 63 µm.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

N. Emel’yanova

Moscow State University

Email: dimi-pavlov@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

D. Pavlov

Moscow State University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: dimi-pavlov@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

Hai Dinh Thi

Coastal Branch of Joint Vietnam—Russia Tropical Science and Technology Research Center

Email: dimi-pavlov@yandex.ru
越南, Nha Trang

参考

  1. Емельянова Н.Г., Павлов Д.А. 2012. Ультраструктура гaмет некоторых видов семейства Mullidae Южно-Китайского моря // Вопр. ихтиологии. Т. 52. № 6. С. 701–707.
  2. Емельянова Н.Г., Павлов Д.А. 2014. Ультраструктура гамет двух видов рода Upeneus (Mullidae) Южно-Китайского моря // Там же. Т. 54. № 3. С. 352–358. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0042875214030023
  3. Емельянова Н.Г., Павлов Д.А. 2020. Морфология сперматозоидов рыб семейства Mullidae: Upeneus sulphureus // Там же. Т. 60. № 1. С. 74–81. https://doi.org/10.31857/S004287522001004X
  4. Емельянова Н.Г., Павлов Д.А., Лыонг Тхи Бик Тхуан, ВоТхи Ха. 2013. Некоторые данные по состоянию гонад полосатой зубатой барабули Parupeneus multifasciatus (Mullidae) залива Нячанг Южно-Китайского моря // Там же. Т. 53. № 5. С. 603–612. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0042875213050032
  5. Емельянова Н.Г., Павлов Д.А., Лыонг Тхи Бик Тхуан, Во Тхи Ха. 2015. Состояние гонад, подвижность сперматозоидов и начальные стадии эмбрионального развития Upeneus tragula (Mullidae) // Там же. Т. 55. № 2. С. 196–206. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0042875215020071
  6. Куцын Д.Н. 2022. Возраст, рост, созревание и смертность султанки Mullus barbatus (Mullidae) Крыма, Чёрное море // Там же. Т. 62. № 2. С. 188–197. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0042875222010088
  7. Макеева А.П. 1992. Эмбриология рыб. М.: Изд-во МГУ, 216 с.
  8. Мурза И.Г., Христофоров О.Л. 2009. Об унификации расчёта коэффициента упитанности у лососевых рыб // Матер. XXVIII Междунар. конф. “Биологические ресурсы Белого моря и внутренних водоёмов Европейского Севера”. Петрозаводск: Изд-во КарНЦ РАН. С. 376–380 (http://www.krc.karelia.ru/publ.php?plang=r&id=7222. Version 08/2023).
  9. Овен Л.С. 2004. Специфика развития половых клеток морских рыб в период размножения как показатель типа нереста и реакции на условия среды обитания. М.: Изд-во ВНИРО, 186 с.
  10. Павлов Д.А., Емельянова Н.Г., Лыонг Тхи Бик Тхуан, Во Тхи Ха. 2011. Размножение и начальное развитие полосатой зубатой барабули Parupeneus multifasciatus (Mullidae) // Вопр. ихтиологии. Т. 51. № 5. С. 628–641.
  11. Роскин Г.И., Левинсон Л.Б. 1957. Микроскопическая техника. М.: Сов. наука, 467 с.
  12. Уикли Б. 1975. Электронная микроскопия для начинающих. М.: Мир, 324 с.
  13. Abu El-Regal M.A. 2018. Reproductive biology of the yellow-striped goatfish Mulloidichthys flavolineatus (Lacepède, 1801) (Perciformes: Mullidae) in the Red Sea, Egypt // Egypt. J. Aquat. Biol. Fish. V. 22. № 4. P. 233–247. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejabf.2018.17159
  14. Akter M., Sharifuzzaman S.M., Shan X., Rashed-Un-Nabi Md. 2020. Reproduction, growth, mortality and yield of the goatfish Upeneus sulphureus in Northern Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh // J. Ichthyol. V. 60. № 3. P. 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0032945220030017
  15. Berois N., Arezo M.J., Papa N.G. 2011. Gamete interactions in teleost fish: the egg envelope. Basic studies and perspectives as environmental biomonitor // Biol. Res. V. 44. № 2. P. 119–124. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0716–97602011000200002
  16. Bogorodsky S.V., Randall J.E., Golani D. 2011. Four new records of shore fishes for the Red Sea, with notes on Parupeneus heptacanthus and Diodon liturosus // Zootaxa. V. 3057. № 1. P. 49–60. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3057.1.2
  17. Echreshavi S., Esmaeili H.R., Al Jufaili S.M. 2022. Goatfishes of the world: an updated list of taxonomy, distribution and conservation status (Teleostei: Mullidae) // FishTaxa. № 23. P. 1–29 (https://fishtaxa.com/article-view/?id=58. Version 08/2023).
  18. El-Drawany M.A. 2013. Age, growth and reproduction of the gold band goatfish, Upeneus moluccensis off the Elkhoms coast of Libya // Delta J. Sci. V. 36. № 2. P. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.21608/djs.2013.139578
  19. Froese R., Pauly D. (eds.). 2023. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication (www.fishbase.org. Version 02/2023).
  20. Gell F.R., Whittington M.W. 2002. Diversity of fishes in seagrass beds in the Quirimba Archipelago, northern Mozambique // Mar. Freshw. Res. V. 53. № 2. P. 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF01125
  21. Giulianini P.G., Ferrero E.A. 2001. Ultrastructural aspects of the ovarian follicle and egg envelope of the sea-grass goby Zosterisessor ophiocephalus (Osteichthyes, Gobiidae) // Ital. J. Zool. V. 68. № 1. P. 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/11250000109356380
  22. Götting K.J. 1961. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Grundlagen der Fortpflanzung und zur Fruchtbarkeits-bestimmung bei marinen Teleosteern // Helgoländ. Wiss. Meersunters. V. 8. № 1. P. 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01609945
  23. Gumanao G.S., Saceda-Cardoza M.M., Mueller B., Bos A.R. 2016. Length–weight and length–length relationships of 139 Indo-Pacific fish species (Teleostei) from the Davao Gulf, Philippines // J. Appl. Ichthyol. V. 33. № 2. P. 377–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.12993
  24. Gwo J.-C., Yang W.-T., Kuo M.-C. et al. 2004. Spermatozoal ultrastructures of two marine perciform teleost fishes, the goatfish, Paraupeneus spilurus (Mullidae) and the rabbit fish, Siganus fuscescens (Siganidae) from Taiwan // Tissue Cell. V. 36. № 1. P. 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tice.2003.10.001
  25. Huysentruyt F., Adriaens D. 2005. Adhesive structures in the eggs of Corydoras aeneus (Gill, 1858; Callichthyidae) // J. Fish Biol. V. 66. № 3. P. 871–876. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022–1112.2005.00647.x
  26. İşmen A. 2005. Age, growth and reproduction of the goldband goatfish, Upeneus moluccensis (Bleeker, 1855), in İskenderun Bay, the Eastern Mediterranean // Turk. J. Zool. V. 29. № 4. P. 301–309 (https://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/zoology/vol29/iss4/3. Version 08/2023).
  27. İşmen A. 2006. Growth and reproduction of por’s goatfish (Upeneus pori Ben-Tuvia & Golani, 1989) in İskenderun Bay, the eastern Mediterranean // Ibid. V. 30. № 1. P. 91–98 (https://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/zoology/vol30/iss1/12. Version 08/2023).
  28. Ketabi R., Esmaeili H.R., Echreshavi S., Jamili S. 2017. A note on the cinnabar goatfish, Parupeneus heptacanthus (Lacepède, 1802) from northern parts of the Persian Gulf and the Makran Sea (Teleostei: Mullidae) // FishTaxa. V. 2. № 4. P. 195–200 (https://fishtaxa.com/article-view/?id=9. Version 08/2023).
  29. Kokokiris L., Stamoulis A., Monokrousos N., Doulgeraki S. 2014. Oocytes development, maturity classification, maturity size and spawning season of the red mullet (Mullus barbatus barbatus Linnaeus, 1758) // J. Appl. Ichthyol. № 30. № 1. P. 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.12292
  30. Lucano-Ramírez G., Ruiz-Ramírez S., Rojo-Vázquez J.A. 2006. Composición portallas y ciclo reproductivo de Pseudupeneus grandisquamis (Pisces: Mullidae) en el Pacífico central Mexicano // Rev. Biol. Trop. V. 54. № 1. P. 195–207. https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v54i1.13996
  31. Matsuyama M., Nagahama Y., Matsuura S. 1991. Observation on ovarian follicle ultrastructure in the marine teleost, Pagrus major, during vitellogenesis and oocyte maturation // Aquaculture. V. 92. P. 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044–8486(91)90009-V
  32. Matthews T., Ochavillo D., Felise S. et al. 2019. Length-weight relationships for 71 reef and bottomfish species from Tutuila and Aunu’u, American Samoa // PIFSC Admin. Rept. H-19–03. 9 p. https://doi.org/10.25923/r3wq-ax31
  33. Muda O., Isa M.M., Vinh C.T. et al. 2001. Fish taxonomic studies in the South China Sea, Area IV: Vietnamese waters // Proc. 4th Techn. Seminar on marine fishery resources survey in the South China Sea, Area IV: Vietnamese waters. Bangkok: Secretariat, SEAFDEC. P. 41–54 (http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12066/4368. Version 08/2023).
  34. Muñoz M., Casadevall M., Bonet S. 2002. Gametogenesis of Helicolenus dactylopterus dactylopterus (Teleostei, Scorpaenidae) // Sarsia. V. 87. № 2. P. 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/003648202320205193
  35. Myers R.F. 1999. Micronesian reef fishes: a comprehensive guide to the coral reef fishes of Micronesia. Barrigada, Guam: Coral Graphics, 330 p.
  36. N’Da K., Déniel C. 1993. Sexual cycle and seasonal changes in the ovary of the red mullet, Mullus surmuletus, from the southern coast of Brittany // J. Fish Biol. V. 43. № 2. P. 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095–8649.1993.tb00425.x
  37. Nguyen L.V., Mai D.X. 2020. Reef fish fauna in the coastal waters of Vietnam // Mar. Biodivers. V. 50. № 6. Article 100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526–020–01131–2
  38. Ozvarol Z.A.B., Balci B.A., Tasli M.G.A. et al. 2010. Age, growth and reproduction of goldband goatfish (Upeneus moluccensis Bleeker (1855)) from the Gulf of Antalya (Turkey) // J. Anim. Vet. Adv. V. 9. № 5. P. 939–945. https://doi.org/10.3923/javaa.2010.939.945
  39. Pavlov D.A., Emel’yanova N.G., Luong Thi Bich Thuan, Vo Thi Ha. 2014. Reproduction of freckled goatfish Upeneus tragula (Mullidae) in the coastal zone of Vietnam // J. Ichthyol. V. 54. № 10. P. 893–904. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0032945214100129
  40. Randall J.E. 2001. Mullidae. Goatfishes (surmullets) // The living marine resources of the western Central Pacific. V. 5. Bony fishes. Pt. 3. (Menidae to Pomacentridae). Rome: FAO. P. 3175–3200.
  41. Randall J.E. 2004. Revision of the goatfish genus Parupeneus (Perciformes: Mullidae), with descriptions of two new species // Indo-Pac. Fish. V. 36. 64 p.
  42. Randall J.E., Heemstra E. 2009. Three new goatfishes of the genus Parupeneus from the western Indian Ocean, with resurrection of P. seychellensis // Smithiana Bull. № 10. P. 37–50.
  43. Randall J.E., King D.R. 2009. Parupeneus fraserorum, a new species of goatfish (Perciformes: Mullidae) from South Africa and Madagascar // Ibid. № 10. P. 23–29.
  44. Reed E.M., Taylor B.M. 2020. Life history of two data-poor but commercially valuable tropical reef fishes, Parupeneus barberinus and Mulloidichthys flavolineatus, from the Saipan fishery, Northern Mariana Islands // Mar. Freshw. Res. V. 72. № 3. P. 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF20049
  45. Reñones O., Massutí E., Morales-Nin B. 1995. Life history of the red mullet Mullus surmuletus from the bottom-trawl fishery on the Island of Majorca (north-west Mediterranean) // Mar. Biol. V. 123. № 3. P. 411–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00349219
  46. Sabrah M.M., El-Ganainy A.A. 2009. Observation on biological traits of striped goatfish (Upeneus vittatus) and freckled goatfish (Upeneus tragula) from the Gulf of Suez, Egypt // World J. Fish Mar. Sci. V. 1. № 2. P. 121–128.
  47. Saeed A. A.R., Moharram S. G., Al-Abbasi F.A. 2018. Comparative gametogenesis and biochemical differentiation of goatfish (Parupeneus heptacanthus and Parupeneus cyclostomus) from Red Sea // Russ. J. Mar. Biol. V. 44. № 2. P. 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063074018020086
  48. Samejima S., Uehara M., Tachihara K. 2021. Life-history traits of a widely distributed coral reef fish, Mulloidichthys flavolineatus (Mullidae), Okinawa Island, southern Japan // Environ. Biol. Fish. V. 104. № 12. P. 1559–1574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641–021–01168–7
  49. Sancho G., Solow A.R., Lobel P.S. 2000. Environmental influences on the diel timing of spawning in coral reef fishes // Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. V. 206. P. 193–212. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps206193
  50. Sparre P., Venema C.S. 1998. Introduction to tropical fish stock assessment. Pt. I: Manual // FAO Fish. Tech. Pap. Rev. № 306/1. Rev. 2. 407 p.
  51. Talet L. B., Talet A.B., Boutiba Z. 2016. Population dynamic parameters of the red mullet Mullus barbatus (Mullidae) in the Arzew Gulf, Algeria // Int. J. Aquat. Biol. V. 4. № 1. P. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijab.v4i1.116
  52. Uiblein F. 2007. Goatfishes (Mullidae) as indicators in tropical and temperate coastal habitat monitoring and management // Mar. Biol. Res. V. 3. № 5. P. 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/17451000701687129
  53. Uiblein F. 2021. Taxonomic review of the “posteli-species group” of goatfishes (genus Parupeneus, Mullidae), with description of a new species from the northern Red Sea // Cybium. V. 45. № 1. P. 63–77. https://doi.org/10.26028/cybium/2021–451–008
  54. Uiblein F., Hoang T.A., Gledhill D. 2017. Redescription and new records of Jansen’s goatfish, Parupeneus jansenii (Mullidae), from the Western Pacific and Eastern Indian Ocean // Zootaxa. V. 4344. № 3. P. 541–559. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4344.3.6
  55. Wahbeh M.I. 1992. Aspects of the reproduction biology and growth of two species of goatfish (Mullidae) from Aqaba, Red Sea // Seckenberg. Marit. V. 22. № 3–6. P. 255–264.
  56. Yanagawa H. 1994. Length weight relationship of Gulf of Thailand fishes // Naga, ICLARM Q. V. 17. № 4. P. 48–52.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载
2. Fig. 1. Relationship between weight (W) and body length according to Smith (FL) of Parupeneus heptacanthus: (○, ···) – females: W = 0.0532FL2.6844; (■, ―) – males: W = 0.0157FL3.0956.

下载 (64KB)
索引源数据
3. Fig. 2. Fragment of the ovary of Parupeneus heptacanthus FL 140 mm (stage IV maturity, gonadosomatic index 3.63%): 1–3 – oocytes: 1 – previtellogenic, 2 – vitellogenic in the process of accumulation of lipid and yolk inclusions, 3 – filled with yolk; 4 – lipid droplets. Scale: 100 µm.

下载 (526KB)
索引源数据
4. Fig. 3. Distribution of Parupeneus heptacanthus FL 160 mm oocytes (IV–V maturity stage, gonadosomatic index 4.71) by diameter (n = 154).

下载 (66KB)
索引源数据
5. Fig. 4. Fragment of the testis of Parupeneus heptacanthus FL 209 mm (gonadosomatic index 0.35%): 1 – spermatozoa, 2 – spermatids, 3 – second-order spermatocytes. Scale: 25 µm.

下载 (388KB)
索引源数据
6. Fig. 5. Ultrastructure of the egg membranes (a) and cytoplasm (b) of Parupeneus heptacanthus: 1 – zona radiata, 2 – chorion, 3 – cortical alveolus, 4 – yolk granule, 5 – electron-dense peripheral part of the granule, 6 – mitochondria, 7 – porous plates, 8 – granular endoplasmic reticulum. Scale: 1 µm.

下载 (328KB)
索引源数据
7. Fig. 6. Ultrastructure of Parupeneus heptacanthus spermatozoa: a – general view, b – fragment; c, d – longitudinal sections; 1, 2 – proximal and distal centrioles, respectively; 3 – axoneme, 4 – mitochondria in the middle part of the spermatozoa, 5 – cross sections of flagella, (→) – flattened side of the head. Scale, µm: a – 10; b–d – 1.

下载 (217KB)
索引源数据

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024