<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Cell and Tissue Biology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Cell and Tissue Biology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Цитология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0041-3771</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">3034-6061</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">The Russian Academy of Sciences</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">669644</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31857/S0041377123030069</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">VDOROR</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Ubiquitin–Proteasome System in Cell Pluripotency and Differentiation</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Убиквитин-протеасомная система в регуляции клеточной плюрипотентности и дифференцировки</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Podenkova</surname><given-names>U. I.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Поденкова</surname><given-names>У. И.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>atsimokha@incras.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Zubarev</surname><given-names>I. V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Зубарев</surname><given-names>И. В.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>atsimokha@incras.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Tomilin</surname><given-names>A. N.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Томилин</surname><given-names>А. Н.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>atsimokha@incras.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Tsimokha</surname><given-names>A. S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Цимоха</surname><given-names>А. С.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>atsimokha@incras.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Институт цитологии РАН</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2023-05-01" publication-format="electronic"><day>01</day><month>05</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>65</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>232</fpage><lpage>245</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-02-27"><day>27</day><month>02</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2023, У.И. Поденкова, И.В. Зубарев, А.Н. Томилин, А.С. Цимоха</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2023, У.И. Поденкова, И.В. Зубарев, А.Н. Томилин, А.С. Цимоха</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">У.И. Поденкова, И.В. Зубарев, А.Н. Томилин, А.С. Цимоха</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">У.И. Поденкова, И.В. Зубарев, А.Н. Томилин, А.С. Цимоха</copyright-holder></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://vietnamjournal.ru/0041-3771/article/view/669644">https://vietnamjournal.ru/0041-3771/article/view/669644</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p id="idm45181322577216">Pluripotent stem cells (PSCs), represented primarily by embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), have a unique ability to self-renew and differentiate into all types of somatic cells. Dissecting molecular mechanisms controlling these properties is important for an efficient and safe introduction of PSCs into clinics. Growing evidence indicates that the proteostasis plays a central role in PSCs fate decisions. This review focuses on the role of the ubiquitin-proteasome system, a key member of the proteostasis network, in the regulation of pluripotency and differentiation of PSCs.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p id="idm45181322576624">Эмбриональные стволовые клетки (ЭСК) и индуцированные плюрипотентные стволовые клетки (иПСК) демонстрируют уникальную способность к непрерывному самообновлению и дифференцировке во все типы соматических клеток. Понимание механизмов, контролирующих эти свойства, приблизит к эффективному и безопасному использованию ЭСК и иПСК в клеточной терапии. Недавние совокупные данные подчеркнули важность протеостаза в поддержании функции ЭСК. Настоящий обзор посвящен роли убиквитин-протеасомной системы (УПС) – ключевого участника сети протеостаза – в регуляции плюрипотентности и дифференцировки ЭСК и иПСК.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>deubiquitinases</kwd><kwd>differentiation</kwd><kwd>embryonic stem cells</kwd><kwd>pluripotency</kwd><kwd>proteasome</kwd><kwd>ubiquitin ligases</kwd><kwd>ubiquitin–proteasome system</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>деубиквитиназы</kwd><kwd>дифференцировка</kwd><kwd>плюрипотентность</kwd><kwd>протеасома</kwd><kwd>убиквитин-лигазы</kwd><kwd>убиквитин-протеасомная система</kwd><kwd>эмбриональные стволовые клетки</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Гордеев М.Н., Бахмет Е.И., Томилин А.Н. 2021. Динамика плюрипотентности в эмбриогенезе и в культуре. Онтогенез. Т. 52. № 6. С. 429. (Gordeev M., Bakhmet E., Tomilin A. 2021. Pluripotency dynamics during embryogenesis and in cell culture. Russ. J. Dev. Biol. V. 52. № 6. P. 379.)https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062360421060059</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Селенина А.В., Цимоха А.С., Томилин А.Н. 2017. Протеасомы в регуляции белкового гомеостаза плюрипотентных стволовых клеток. Acta Naturae. Т. 9. № 3. С. 42. (Selenina A.V., Tsimokha A.S., Tomilin A.N. 2017. Proteasomes in protein homeostasis of pluripotent stem cells. Acta Naturae. V. 9. № 3. P. 42.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Abu-Dawud R., Graffmann N., Ferber S., Wruck W., Adjaye J. 2018. Pluripotent stem cells: induction and self-renewal. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. V. 373. P. 20170213. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0213</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Al Mamun M.M., Khan M.R., Zhu Y., Zhang Y., Zhou S., Xu R., Bukhari I., Thorne R.F., Li J., Zhang X.D. 2022. Stub1 maintains proteostasis of master transcription factors in embryonic stem cells. Cell Rep. V. 39. P. 110919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110919</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Alekseenko Z., Dias J.M., Adler A.F., Kozhevnikova M., van Lunteren J.A., Nolbrant S., Jeggari A., Vasylovska S., Yoshitake T., Kehr J. 2022. Robust derivation of transplantable dopamine neurons from human pluripotent stem cells by timed retinoic acid delivery. Nature Commun. V.13. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30777-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Babaie Y., Herwig R., Greber B., Brink T.C., Wruck W., Groth D., Lehrach H., Burdon T., Adjaye J. 2007. Analysis of Oct4-dependent transcriptional networks regulating self-renewal and pluripotency in human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. V. 25. P. 500. https://doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.2006-0426</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Baharvand H., Hajheidari M., Ashtiani S.K., Salekdeh G.H. 2006. Proteomic signature of human embryonic stem cells. Proteomics. V. 6. P. 3544. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200500844</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Bai M., Zhao X., Sahara K., Ohte Y., Hirano Y., Kaneko T., Yashiroda H., Murata S. 2014. Assembly mechanisms of specialized core particles of the proteasome. Biomolecules. V. 4. P. 662. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom4030662</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Beckwith R., Estrin E., Worden E.J., Martin A. 2013. Reconstitution of the 26S proteasome reveals functional asymmetries in its AAA+ unfoldase. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. V. 20. P. 1164. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2659</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Behbahan I.S., Duan Y., Lam A., Khoobyari S., Ma X., Ahuja T.P., Zern M.A. 2011. New approaches in the differentiation of human embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells toward hepatocytes. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. V. 7. P. 748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-010-9216-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Bernstein B.E., Mikkelsen T.S., Xie X., Kamal M., Huebert D.J., Cuff J., Fry B., Meissner A., Wernig M., Plath K. 2006. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell. V. 125. P. 315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.041</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Biancotti J.C., Narwani K., Buehler N., Mandefro B., Golan-Lev T., Yanuka O., Clark A., Hill D., Benvenisty N., Lavon N. 2010. Human embryonic stem cells as models for aneuploid chromosomal syndromes. Stem Cells. V. 28. P. 1530. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.483</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Blondelle J., Shapiro P., Domenighetti A.A., Lange S. 2017. Cullin E3 ligase activity is required for myoblast differentiation. J. Mol. Biol. V. 429. P. 1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2017.02.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Buckley S.M., Aranda-Orgilles B., Strikoudis A., Apostolou E., Loizou E., Moran-Crusio K., Farnsworth C.L., Koller A.A., Dasgupta R., Silva J.C., Stadtfeld M., Hochedlinger K., Chen E.I., Aifantis I. 2012. Regulation of pluripotency and cellular reprogramming by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Cell Stem Cell. V. 11. P. 783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2012.09.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Budenholzer L., Cheng C.L., Li Y., Hochstrasser M. 2017. Proteasome Structure and Assembly. J. Mol. Biol. V. 429. P. 3500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2017.05.027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Bustos F., Segarra-Fas A., Chaugule V.K., Brandenburg L., Branigan E., Toth R., Macartney T., Knebel A., Hay R.T., Walden H. 2018. RNF12 X-linked intellectual disability mutations disrupt E3 ligase activity and neural differentiation. Cell Rep. V. 23. P. 1599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Cao F., Lin S., Xie X., Ray P., Patel M., Zhang X., Drukker M., Dylla S.J., Connolly A.J., Chen X. 2006. In vivo visualization of embryonic stem cell survival, proliferation, and migration after cardiac delivery. Circulation. V. 113. P. 1005. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.588954</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Cascio P., Hilton C., Kisselev A.F., Rock K.L., Goldberg A.L. 2001. 26S proteasomes and immunoproteasomes produce mainly N-extended versions of an antigenic peptide. EMBO J. V. 20. P. 2357. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/20.10.2357</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Choi J., Baek K.H. 2018. Cellular functions of stem cell factors mediated by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. V. 75. P. 1947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-018-2770-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Ciechanover A., Kwon Y.T. 2015. Degradation of misfolded proteins in neurodegenerative diseases: therapeutic targets and strategies. Exp. Mol. Med. V. 47. P. e147. https://doi.org/10.1038/emm.2014.117</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Cui Z., Hwang S.M., Gomes A.V. 2014. Identification of the immunoproteasome as a novel regulator of skeletal muscle differentiation. Mol. Cell. Biol. V. 34. P. 96. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00622-13</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Dahlmann B. 2005. Proteasomes. Essays Biochem. V. 41. P. 31. https://doi.org/10.1042/EB0410031</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>de Napoles M., Mermoud J.E., Wakao R., Tang Y.A., Endoh M., Appanah R., Nesterova T.B., Silva J., Otte A.P., Vidal M. 2004. Polycomb group proteins Ring1A/B link ubiquitylation of histone H2A to heritable gene silencing and X inactivation. Dev. Cell. V. 7. P. 663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2004.10.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Diefenbacher M.E., Chakraborty A., Blake S.M., Mitter R., Popov N., Eilers M., Behrens A. 2015. Usp28 counteracts Fbw7 in intestinal homeostasis and cancer. Cancer Res. V. 75. P. 1181. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-1726</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Dieudonne F.-X., Sévère N., Biosse-Duplan M., Weng J.-J., Su Y., Marie P.J. 2013. Promotion of osteoblast differentiation in mesenchymal cells through Cbl-mediated control of STAT5 activity. Stem Cells. V. 31. P. 1340. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.1380</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Drews O., Taegtmeyer H. 2014. Targeting the ubiquitin-proteasome system in heart disease: the basis for new therapeutic strategies. Antioxid. Redox. Signal. V. 21. P. 2322. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2013.5823</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Du Z., He F., Yu Z., Bowerman B., Bao Z. 2015. E3 ubiquitin ligases promote progression of differentiation during C. elegans embryogenesis. Dev. Biol. V. 398. P. 267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.12.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Dutta D., Sharma V., Mutsuddi M., Mukherjee A. 2021. Regulation of Notch signaling by E3 ubiquitin ligases. FEBS J. V. 289. P. 937. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.15792</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Endoh M., Endo T.A., Endoh T., Fujimura Y.-I., Ohara O., Toyoda T., Otte A.P., Okano M., Brockdorff N., Vidal M. 2008. Polycomb group proteins Ring1A/B are functionally linked to the core transcriptional regulatory circuitry to maintain ES cell identity. Development. V. 135. P. 1513. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.014340</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Fabre B., Lambour T., Garrigues L., Amalric F., Vigneron N., Menneteau T., Stella A., Monsarrat B., Van den Eynde B., Burlet-Schiltz O. 2015. Deciphering preferential interactions within supramolecular protein complexes: the proteasome case. Mol. Syst. Biol. V. 11. P. 771. https://doi.org/10.15252/msb.20145497</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Fang L., Zhang L., Wei W., Jin X., Wang P., Tong Y., Li J., Du J.X., Wong J. 2014. A methylation-phosphorylation switch determines Sox2 stability and function in ESC maintenance or differentiation. Mol. Cell. V. 55. P. 537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Finley D., Tanaka K., Mann C., Feldmann H., Hochstrasser M., Vierstra R., Johnston S., Hampton R., Haber J., McCusker J., Silver P., Frontali L., Thorsness P., Varshavsky A., Byers B. et al. 1998. Unified nomenclature for subunits of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteasome regulatory particle. Trends Biochem. Sci. V. 23. P. 244. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0968-0004(98)01222-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Fort P., Kajava A.V., Delsuc F., Coux O. 2015. Evolution of proteasome regulators in eukaryotes. Genome Biol. Evol. V. 7. P. 1363. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evv068</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Fu X. 2014. The immunogenicity of cells derived from induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell. Mol. Immunol. V. 11. P. 14. https://doi.org/10.1038/cmi.2013.60</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Fuchs G., Shema E., Vesterman R., Kotler E., Wolchinsky Z., Wilder S., Golomb L., Pribluda A., Zhang F., Haj-Yahya M., Feldmesser E., Brik A., Yu X., Hanna J., Aberdam D., Domany E., Oren M. 2012. RNF20 and USP44 regulate stem cell differentiation by modulating H2B monoubiquitylation. Mol. Cell. V. 46. P. 662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Fujikawa T., Oh S.-H., Pi L., Hatch H.M., Shupe T., Petersen B.E. 2005. Teratoma formation leads to failure of treatment for type I diabetes using embryonic stem cell-derived insulin-producing cells. Am. J. Pathol. V. 166. P. 1781. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)62488-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Gao C., Xiao G., Hu J. 2014. Regulation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling by posttranslational modifications. Cell Biosci. V. 4. P. 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-3701-4-13</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Gao J., Buckley S.M., Cimmino L., Guillamot M., Strikoudis A., Cang Y., Goff S.P., Aifantis I. 2015. The CUL4-DDB1 ubiquitin ligase complex controls adult and embryonic stem cell differentiation and homeostasis. Elife. V. 4. P. e07539. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07539</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Glickman M.H., Rubin D.M., Coux O., Wefes I., Pfeifer G., Cjeka Z., Baumeister W., Fried V. A., Finley D. 1998. A subcomplex of the proteasome regulatory particle required for ubiquitin-conjugate degradation and related to the COP9-signalosome and eIF3. Cell. V. 94. P. 615. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81603-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Groll M., Bajorek M., Kohler A., Moroder L., Rubin D.M., Huber R., Glickman M.H., Finley D. 2000. A gated channel into the proteasome core particle. Nat. Struct. Biol. V. 7. P. 1062. https://doi.org/10.1038/80992</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>Groll M., Bochtler M., Brandstetter H., Clausen T., Huber R. 2005. Molecular machines for protein degradation. Chembiochem. V. 6. P. 222. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.200400313</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>Groll M., Ditzel L., Lowe J., Stock D., Bochtler M., Bartunik H.D., Huber R. 1997. Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4 A resolution. Nature. V. 386. P. 463. https://doi.org/10.1038/386463a0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>Hatakeyama S. 2012. Ubiquitin-mediated regulation of JAK-STAT signaling in embryonic stem cells. JAKSTAT. V. 1. P. 168. https://doi.org/10.4161/jkst.21560</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation>Hayashi K., de Sousa Lopes S.M.C., Tang F., Surani M.A. 2008. Dynamic equilibrium and heterogeneity of mouse pluripotent stem cells with distinct functional and epigenetic states. Cell Stem Cell. V. 3. P. 391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2008.07.027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><mixed-citation>He M., Zhou Z., Shah A.A., Zou H., Tao J., Chen Q., Wan Y. 2016. The emerging role of deubiquitinating enzymes in genomic integrity, diseases, and therapeutics. Cell Biosci. V. 6. P. 62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-016-0127-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><mixed-citation>Hernebring M., Brolen G., Aguilaniu H., Semb H., Nystrom T. 2006. Elimination of damaged proteins during differentiation of embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. V. 103. P. 7700. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510944103</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><mixed-citation>Hernebring M., Fredriksson A., Liljevald M., Cvijovic M., Norrman K., Wiseman J., Semb H., Nystrom T. 2013. Removal of damaged proteins during ES cell fate specification requires the proteasome activator PA28. Sci. Rep. V. 3. P. 1381. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01381</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><mixed-citation>Hershko A., Ciechanover A. 1992. The ubiquitin system for protein degradation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. V. 61. P. 761. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bi.61.070192.003553</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><mixed-citation>Hershko A., Ciechanover A. 1998. The ubiquitin system. Annu. Rev. Biochem. V. 67. P. 425. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.67.1.425</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><mixed-citation>Inoue D., Aihara H., Sato T., Mizusaki H., Doiguchi M., Higashi M., Imamura Y., Yoneda M., Miyanishi T., Fujii S. 2015. Dzip3 regulates developmental genes in mouse embryonic stem cells by reorganizing 3D chromatin conformation. Sci. Rep. V. 5. P. 16567. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16567</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><mixed-citation>Jiang T.X., Zhao M., Qiu X.B. 2018. Substrate receptors of proteasomes. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. V. 93. P. 1765. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12419</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><mixed-citation>Jing X., Infante J., Nachtman R.G., Jurecic R. 2008. E3 ligase FLRF (Rnf41) regulates differentiation of hematopoietic progenitors by governing steady-state levels of cytokine and retinoic acid receptors. Exp. Hematol. V. 36. P. 1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exphem.2008.04.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B53"><label>53.</label><mixed-citation>Kammerl I.E., Dann A., Mossina A., Brech D., Lukas C., Vosyka O., Nathan P., Conlon T.M., Wagner D.E., Overkleeft H.S. 2016. Impairment of immunoproteasome function by cigarette smoke and in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. V. 193. P. 1230. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201506-1122OC</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B54"><label>54.</label><mixed-citation>Kim S.-H., Kim M.O., Cho Y.-Y., Yao K., Kim D.J., Jeong C.-H., Yu D.H., Bae K.B., Cho E.J., Jung S.K. 2014. ERK1 phosphorylates Nanog to regulate protein stability and stem cell self-renewal. Stem Cell Res. V. 13. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scr.2014.04.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B55"><label>55.</label><mixed-citation>Konstantinova I.M., Tsimokha A.S., Mittenberg A.G. 2008. Role of proteasomes in cellular regulation. Int. Rev. Cell. Mol. Biol. V. 267. P. 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1937-6448(08)00602-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B56"><label>56.</label><mixed-citation>Li S., Xiao F., Zhang J., Sun X., Wang H., Zeng Y., Hu J., Tang F., Gu J., Zhao Y., Jin Y., Liao B. 2018. Disruption of OCT4 ubiquitination increases OCT4 protein stability and ASH2L-B-mediated H3K4 methylation promoting pluripotency acquisition. Stem Cell Reports. V. 11. P. 973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.09.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B57"><label>57.</label><mixed-citation>Liao B., Zhong X., Xu H., Xiao F., Fang Z., Gu J., Chen Y., Zhao Y., Jin Y. 2013. Itch, an E3 ligase of Oct4, is required for embryonic stem cell self-renewal and pluripotency induction. J. Cell. Physiol. V. 228. P. 1443. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.24297</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B58"><label>58.</label><mixed-citation>Liu X., Yao Y., Ding H., Han C., Chen Y., Zhang Y., Wang C., Zhang X., Zhang Y., Zhai Y. 2016. USP21 deubiquitylates Nanog to regulate protein stability and stem cell pluripotency. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. V. 1. P. 16024. https://doi.org/10.1038/sigtrans.2016.24</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B59"><label>59.</label><mixed-citation>Liu Y.-J., Nakamura T., Nakano T. 2012. Essential role of DPPA3 for chromatin condensation in mouse oocytogenesis. Biol. Reprod. V. 86. P. 40. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.111.095018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B60"><label>60.</label><mixed-citation>Liu Y., Xu H.W., Wang L., Li S.Y., Zhao C.J., Hao J., Li Q.Y., Zhao T.T., Wu W., Wang Y. 2018. Human embryonic stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelium transplants as a potential treatment for wet age-related macular degeneration. Cell Discov. V. 4. P. 50. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41421-018-0053-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B61"><label>61.</label><mixed-citation>Mattout A., Meshorer E. 2010. Chromatin plasticity and genome organization in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. V. 22. P. 334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2010.02.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B62"><label>62.</label><mixed-citation>Meiners S., Keller I.E., Semren N., Caniard A. 2014. Regulation of the proteasome: evaluating the lung proteasome as a new therapeutic target. Antioxid. Redox. Signal. V. 21. P. 2364. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2013.5798</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B63"><label>63.</label><mixed-citation>Meiners S., Ludwig A., Stangl V., Stangl K. 2008. Proteasome inhibitors: poisons and remedies. Med. Res. Rev. V. 28. P. 309. https://doi.org/10.1002/med.20111</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B64"><label>64.</label><mixed-citation>Meshorer E., Misteli T. 2006. Chromatin in pluripotent embryonic stem cells and differentiation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. V. 7. P. 540. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1938</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B65"><label>65.</label><mixed-citation>Miyazono K. 2000. TGF-β signaling by Smad proteins. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. V. 11. P. 15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1359-6101(99)00025-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B66"><label>66.</label><mixed-citation>Morozov A.V., Karpov V.L. 2018. Biological consequences of structural and functional proteasome diversity. Heliyon. V. 4. P. e00894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00894</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B67"><label>67.</label><mixed-citation>Murata S., Takahama Y., Tanaka K. 2008. Thymoproteasome: probable role in generating positively selecting peptides. Curr. Opin. Immunol. V. 20. P. 192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2008.03.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B68"><label>68.</label><mixed-citation>Nakagawa T., Kajitani T., Togo S., Masuko N., Ohdan H., Hishikawa Y., Koji T., Matsuyama T., Ikura T., Muramatsu M. 2008. Deubiquitylation of histone H2A activates transcriptional initiation via trans-histone cross-talk with H3K4 di-and trimethylation. Genes Dev. V. 22. P. 37. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1609708</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B69"><label>69.</label><mixed-citation>Nakamura T., Arai Y., Umehara H., Masuhara M., Kimura T., Taniguchi H., Sekimoto T., Ikawa M., Yoneda Y., Okabe M. 2007. PGC7/Stella protects against DNA demethylation in early embryogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. V. 9. P. 64. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1519</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B70"><label>70.</label><mixed-citation>Nakamura T., Liu Y.-J., Nakashima H., Umehara H., Inoue K., Matoba S., Tachibana M., Ogura A., Shinkai Y., Nakano T. 2012. PGC7 binds histone H3K9me2 to protect against conversion of 5mC to 5hmC in early embryos. Nature. V. 486. P. 415. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11093</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B71"><label>71.</label><mixed-citation>Nandi D., Tahiliani P., Kumar A., Chandu D. 2006. The ubiquitin-proteasome system. J. Biosci. V. 31. P. 137. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02705243</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B72"><label>72.</label><mixed-citation>Ng H.-H., Surani M.A. 2011. The transcriptional and signalling networks of pluripotency. Nat. Cell Biol. V. 13. P. 490. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb0511-490</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B73"><label>73.</label><mixed-citation>Nguyen D.T.T., Richter D., Michel G., Mitschka S., Kolanus W., Cuevas E., Wulczyn F.G. 2017. The ubiquitin ligase LIN41/TRIM71 targets p53 to antagonize cell death and differentiation pathways during stem cell differentiation. Cell Death Differ. V. 24. P. 1063. https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2017.54</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B74"><label>74.</label><mixed-citation>Noormohammadi A., Calculli G., Gutierrez-Garcia R., Khodakarami A., Koyuncu S., Vilchez D. 2018. Mechanisms of protein homeostasis (proteostasis) maintain stem cell identity in mammalian pluripotent stem cells. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. V. 75. P. 275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-017-2602-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B75"><label>75.</label><mixed-citation>Okita Y., Matsumoto A., Yumimoto K., Isoshita R., Nakayama K.I. 2012. Increased efficiency in the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells by F bxw7 ablation. Genes Cells. V. 17. P. 768. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2443.2012.01626.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B76"><label>76.</label><mixed-citation>Okita Y., Nakayama K.I. 2012. UPS delivers pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell. V. 11. P. 728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2012.11.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B77"><label>77.</label><mixed-citation>Okumura F., Matsunaga Y., Katayama Y., Nakayama K.I., Hatakeyama S. 2010. TRIM8 modulates STAT3 activity through negative regulation of PIAS3. J. Cell Sci. V. 123. P. 2238. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.068981</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B78"><label>78.</label><mixed-citation>Osmulski P.A., Hochstrasser M., Gaczynska M. 2009. A tetrahedral transition state at the active sites of the 20S proteasome is coupled to opening of the alpha-ring channel. Structure. V. 17. P. 1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2009.06.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B79"><label>79.</label><mixed-citation>Pak C., Danko T., Zhang Y., Aoto J., Anderson G., Maxeiner S., Yi F., Wernig M., Südhof T.C. 2015. Human neuropsychiatric disease modeling using conditional deletion reveals synaptic transmission defects caused by heterozygous mutations in NRXN1. Cell Stem Cell. V. 17. P. 316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2015.07.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B80"><label>80.</label><mixed-citation>Pan J., Deng Q., Jiang C., Wang X., Niu T., Li H., Chen T., Jin J., Pan W., Cai X., Yang X., Lu M., Xiao J., Wang P. 2015. USP37 directly deubiquitinates and stabilizes c-Myc in lung cancer. Oncogene. V. 34. P. 3957. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2014.327</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B81"><label>81.</label><mixed-citation>Pickering A.M., Davies K.J. 2012. Degradation of damaged proteins: the main function of the 20S proteasome. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. V. 109. P. 227. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-397863-9.00006-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B82"><label>82.</label><mixed-citation>Qian M.X., Pang Y., Liu C.H., Haratake K., Du B.Y., Ji D.Y., Wang G.F., Zhu Q.Q., Song W., Yu Y., Zhang X.X., Huang H.T., Miao S., Chen L.B., Zhang Z.H., Liang Y.N. et al. 2013. Acetylation-mediated proteasomal degradation of core histones during DNA repair and spermatogenesis. Cell. V. 153. P. 1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.032</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B83"><label>83.</label><mixed-citation>Rezania A., Bruin J.E., Arora P., Rubin A., Batushansky I., Asadi A., O’dwyer S., Quiskamp N., Mojibian M., Albrecht T. 2014. Reversal of diabetes with insulin-producing cells derived in vitro from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. V. 32. P. 1121. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3033</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B84"><label>84.</label><mixed-citation>Sang H., Wang D., Zhao S., Zhang J., Zhang Y., Xu J., Chen X., Nie Y., Zhang K., Zhang S. 2019. Dppa3 is critical for Lin28a-regulated ES cells naïve–primed state conversion. J. Mol. Cell Biol. V. 11. P. 474. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmcb/mjy069</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B85"><label>85.</label><mixed-citation>Saretzki G., Armstrong L., Leake A., Lako M., von Zglinicki T. 2004. Stress defense in murine embryonic stem cells is superior to that of various differentiated murine cells. Stem Cells. V. 22. P. 962. https://doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.22-6-962</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B86"><label>86.</label><mixed-citation>Saric T., Chang S.-C., Hattori A., York I.A., Markant S., Rock K.L., Tsujimoto M., Goldberg A.L. 2002. An IFN-γ–induced aminopeptidase in the ER, ERAP1, trims precursors to MHC class I–presented peptides. Nat. Immunol. V. 3. P. 1169. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni859</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B87"><label>87.</label><mixed-citation>Sato N., Sanjuan I.M., Heke M., Uchida M., Naef F., Brivanlou A.H. 2003. Molecular signature of human embryonic stem cells and its comparison with the mouse. Dev. Biol. V. 260. P. 404. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0012-1606(03)00256-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B88"><label>88.</label><mixed-citation>Schuldiner M., Eiges R., Eden A., Yanuka O., Itskovitz-Eldor J., Goldstein R.S., Benvenisty N. 2001. Induced neuronal differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Brain Res. V. 913. P. 201. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-8993(01)02776-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B89"><label>89.</label><mixed-citation>Schwartz S.D., Regillo C.D., Lam B.L., Eliott D., Rosenfeld P.J., Gregori N.Z., Hubschman J.-P., Davis J.L., Heilwell G., Spirn M. 2015. Human embryonic stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelium in patients with age-related macular degeneration and Stargardt’s macular dystrophy: follow-up of two open-label phase 1/2 studies. Lancet. V. 385. P. 509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61376-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B90"><label>90.</label><mixed-citation>Seemuller E., Lupas A., Stock D., Lowe J., Huber R., Baumeister W. 1995. Proteasome from Thermoplasma acidophilum: a threonine protease. Science. V. 268. P. 579. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7725107</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B91"><label>91.</label><mixed-citation>Sinenko S.A., Starkova T.Y., Kuzmin A.A., Tomilin A.N. 2021. Physiological signaling functions of reactive oxygen species in stem cells: From flies to man. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. V. 9. P. 714370. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.714370</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B92"><label>92.</label><mixed-citation>Smalle J., Vierstra R.D. 2004. The ubiquitin 26S proteasome proteolytic pathway. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. V. 55. P. 555. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141801</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B93"><label>93.</label><mixed-citation>Stadtmueller B.M., Hill C.P. 2011. Proteasome activators. Mol. Cell. V. 41. P. 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.12.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B94"><label>94.</label><mixed-citation>Sun X.X., He X., Yin L., Komada M., Sears R.C., Dai M.S. 2015. The nucleolar ubiquitin-specific protease USP36 deubiquitinates and stabilizes c-Myc. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. V. 112. P. 3734. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1411713112</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B95"><label>95.</label><mixed-citation>Suresh B., Lee J., Kim K.S., Ramakrishna S. 2016. The importance of ubiquitination and deubiquitination in cellular reprogramming. Stem Cells Int. V. 2016. P. 6705927. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6705927</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B96"><label>96.</label><mixed-citation>Takahashi K., Yamanaka S. 2006. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. V. 126. P. 663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B97"><label>97.</label><mixed-citation>Thomson J.A., Itskovitz-Eldor J., Shapiro S.S., Waknitz M.A., Swiergiel J.J., Marshall V.S., Jones J.M. 1998. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science. V. 282. P. 1145. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5391.1145</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B98"><label>98.</label><mixed-citation>Uechi H., Hamazaki J., Murata S. 2014. Characterization of the testis-specific proteasome subunit alpha4s in mammals. J. Biol. Chem. V. 289. P. 12365. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.558866</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B99"><label>99.</label><mixed-citation>Urbach A., Benvenisty N. 2009. Studying early lethality of 45, XO (Turner’s syndrome) embryos using human embryonic stem cells. PLoS One. V. 4. P. e4175. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004175</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B100"><label>100.</label><mixed-citation>Uyama M., Sato M.M., Kawanami M., Tamura M. 2012. Regulation of osteoblastic differentiation by the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. Genes Cells. V. 17. P. 548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2443.2012.01611.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B101"><label>101.</label><mixed-citation>van der Stoop P., Boutsma E.A., Hulsman D., Noback S., Heimerikx M., Kerkhoven R.M., Voncken J.W., Wessels L.F., van Lohuizen M. 2008. Ubiquitin E3 ligase Ring1b/Rnf2 of polycomb repressive complex 1 contributes to stable maintenance of mouse embryonic stem cells. PLoS One. V. 3. P. e2235. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002235</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B102"><label>102.</label><mixed-citation>Verma R., Aravind L., Oania R., McDonald W.H., Yates J.R., 3rd, Koonin E.V., Deshaies R.J. 2002. Role of Rpn11 metalloprotease in deubiquitination and degradation by the 26S proteasome. Science. V. 298. P. 611. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1075898</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B103"><label>103.</label><mixed-citation>Vilchez D., Boyer L., Lutz M., Merkwirth C., Morantte I., Tse C., Spencer B., Page L., Masliah E., Berggren W.T., Gage F.H., Dillin A. 2013. FOXO4 is necessary for neural differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Aging Cell. V. 12. P. 518. https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.12067</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B104"><label>104.</label><mixed-citation>Vilchez D., Boyer L., Morantte I., Lutz M., Merkwirth C., Joyce D., Spencer B., Page L., Masliah E., Berggren W.T., Gage F.H., Dillin A. 2012a. Increased proteasome activity in human embryonic stem cells is regulated by PSMD11. Nature. V. 489. P. 304. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11468</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B105"><label>105.</label><mixed-citation>Vilchez D., Morantte I., Liu Z., Douglas P.M., Merkwirth C., Rodrigues A.P., Manning G., Dillin A. 2012b. RPN-6 determines C. elegans longevity under proteotoxic stress conditions. Nature. V. 489. P. 263. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11315</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B106"><label>106.</label><mixed-citation>Voutsadakis I.A. 2012. The ubiquitin–proteasome system and signal transduction pathways regulating epithelial mesenchymal transition of cancer. J. Biomed. Sci. V. 19. P. 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/1423-0127-19-67</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B107"><label>107.</label><mixed-citation>Wang D., Bu F., Zhang W. 2019. The role of ubiquitination in regulating embryonic stem cell maintenance and cancer development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. V. 20. P. 2667. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20112667</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B108"><label>108.</label><mixed-citation>Wang X., Meul T., Meiners S. 2020. Exploring the proteasome system: a novel concept of proteasome inhibition and regulation. Pharmacol. Ther. V. 211. P. 107526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107526</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B109"><label>109.</label><mixed-citation>Watanabe M., Takahashi H., Saeki Y., Ozaki T., Itoh S., Suzuki M., Mizushima W., Tanaka K., Hatakeyama S. 2015. The E3 ubiquitin ligase TRIM23 regulates adipocyte differentiation via stabilization of the adipogenic activator PPARγ. Elife. V. 4. P. e05615. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05615</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B110"><label>110.</label><mixed-citation>Weitzman M.D., Lilley C.E., Chaurushiya M.S. 2010. Genomes in conflict: maintaining genome integrity during virus infection. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. V. 64. P. 61. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B111"><label>111.</label><mixed-citation>Werner A., Manford A.G., Rape M. 2017. Ubiquitin-dependent regulation of stem cell biology. Trends Cell Biol. V. 27. P. 568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2017.04.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B112"><label>112.</label><mixed-citation>Xiao N., Eto D., Elly C., Peng G., Crotty S., Liu Y.-C. 2014. The E3 ubiquitin ligase Itch is required for the differentiation of follicular helper T cells. Nat. Immunol. V. 15. P. 657. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.2912</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B113"><label>113.</label><mixed-citation>Xu H., Wang W., Li C., Yu H., Yang A., Wang B., Jin Y. 2009. WWP2 promotes degradation of transcription factor OCT4 in human embryonic stem cells. Cell Res. V. 19. P. 561. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2009.31</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B114"><label>114.</label><mixed-citation>Yadav D., Lee J.Y., Puranik N., Chauhan P.S., Chavda V., Jin J.-O., Lee P.C. 2022. Modulating the ubiquitin–proteasome system: a therapeutic strategy for autoimmune diseases. Cells. V. 11. P. 1093. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11071093</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B115"><label>115.</label><mixed-citation>Yao T., Cohen R.E. 2002. A cryptic protease couples deubiquitination and degradation by the proteasome. Nature. V. 419. P. 403. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01071</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B116"><label>116.</label><mixed-citation>Young L.E., Fernandes K., McEvoy T.G., Butterwith S.C., Gutierrez C.G., Carolan C., Broadbent P.J., Robinson J.J., Wilmut I., Sinclair K.D. 2001. Epigenetic change in IGF2R is associated with fetal overgrowth after sheep embryo culture. Nat. Genet. V. 27. P. 153. https://doi.org/10.1038/84769</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B117"><label>117.</label><mixed-citation>Young R.A. 2011. Control of the embryonic stem cell state. Cell. V. 144. P. 940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.01.032</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B118"><label>118.</label><mixed-citation>Zhang F., Hu Y., Huang P., Toleman C.A., Paterson A.J., Kudlow J.E. 2007. Proteasome function is regulated by cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase through phosphorylation of Rpt6. J. Biol. Chem. V. 282. P. 22460. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M702439200</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B119"><label>119.</label><mixed-citation>Zhang F., Laiho M. 2003. On and off: proteasome and TGF-beta signaling. Exp. Cell Res. V. 291. P. 275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2003.07.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B120"><label>120.</label><mixed-citation>Zhang X., Linder S., Bazzaro M. 2020. Drug development targeting the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS) for the treatment of human cancers. Cancers. V. 12. P. 902. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12040902</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B121"><label>121.</label><mixed-citation>Zhang Y., Ding H., Wang X., Wang X., Wan S., Xu A., Gan R., Ye S.-D. 2021. MK2 promotes Tfcp2l1 degradation via β-TrCP ubiquitin ligase to regulate mouse embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Cell Rep. V. 37. P. 109949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109949</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B122"><label>122.</label><mixed-citation>Zhao S., Zhang C., Xu J., Liu S., Yu L., Chen S., Wen H., Li Z., Liu N. 2022. Dppa3 facilitates self-renewal of embryonic stem cells by stabilization of pluripotent factors. Stem Cell Res. Ther. V. 13. P. 169. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-022-02846-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B123"><label>123.</label><mixed-citation>Zhou L., Mideros S.X., Bao L., Hanlon R., Arredondo F.D., Tripathy S., Krampis K., Jerauld A., Evans C., St Martin S.K. 2009. Infection and genotype remodel the entire soybean transcriptome. BMC Genomics. V. 10. P. 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-49</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B124"><label>124.</label><mixed-citation>Zhou W., Zhu P., Wang J., Pascual G., Ohgi K.A., Lozach J., Glass C.K., Rosenfeld M.G. 2008. Histone H2A monoubiquitination represses transcription by inhibiting RNA polymerase II transcriptional elongation. Mol. Cell. V. 29. P. 69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.002</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
