<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Cell and Tissue Biology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Cell and Tissue Biology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Цитология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0041-3771</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">3034-6061</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">The Russian Academy of Sciences</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">669531</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31857/S004137712306007X</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">ORQQEY</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Structural and Functional Features of Bacterial SMC Complexes</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Особенности структуры и функций бактериальных комплексов SMC</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Morozova</surname><given-names>N. E.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Морозова</surname><given-names>Н. Е.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>misterkotlin@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Potysyeva</surname><given-names>A. S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Потысьева</surname><given-names>А. С.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>misterkotlin@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Vedyaykin</surname><given-names>A. D.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ведяйкин</surname><given-names>А. Д.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>misterkotlin@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, NIK “Nanobiotechnologies”,</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Научно-исследовательский комплекс “Нанобиотехнологии” Санкт-Петербургского политехнического университета Петра Великого</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2023-11-01" publication-format="electronic"><day>01</day><month>11</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>65</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>522</fpage><lpage>534</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-02-27"><day>27</day><month>02</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2023, Н.Е. Морозова, А.С. Потысьева, А.Д. Ведяйкин</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2023, Н.Е. Морозова, А.С. Потысьева, А.Д. Ведяйкин</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Н.Е. Морозова, А.С. Потысьева, А.Д. Ведяйкин</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Н.Е. Морозова, А.С. Потысьева, А.Д. Ведяйкин</copyright-holder></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://vietnamjournal.ru/0041-3771/article/view/669531">https://vietnamjournal.ru/0041-3771/article/view/669531</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p id="idm45257553341712">SMC complexes (Structural maintenance of chromosomes) are key participants in the spatial organization of DNA in all living organisms – in bacteria, archaea and eukaryotes. In bacteria, there are several homologues of SMC complexes that perform seemingly unrelated functions, but function through very similar, highly conserved mechanisms. In recent years, it has been established that SMC complexes are capable of forming loops from DNA (through the so-called loop extrusion), which allows them to be considered as a separate class of DNA translocases. This paper discusses bacterial SMC complexes in comparison with their homologues such as MukBEF, MksBEF, RecN, and Wadjet, as well as with eukaryotic SMC complexes. Their properties, role and functions in the key processes of the bacterial cell are discussed.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p id="idm45257553339440">Белковые комплексы SMC (от англ. Structural maintenance of chromosomes, далее в тексте – комплексы SMC) являются ключевыми участниками пространственной организации ДНК во всех живых организмах – в бактериях, археях и эукариотах. У бактерий имеется несколько гомологов комплексов SMC, которые выполняют, на первый взгляд, несвязанные друг с другом функции, однако действуют посредством очень похожих между собой, высококонсервативных механизмов. За последние годы установлено, что комплексы SMC способны осуществлять формирование петель ДНК (посредством так называемой экструзии петель), что позволяет рассматривать их как отдельный класс ДНК-транслоказ. В данной работе обсуждаются бактериальные комплексы SMC в сравнении с их гомологами, такими как MukBEF, MksBEF, RecN и Wadjet, а также с комплексами SMC эукариот. Обсуждаются их свойства, роль и функции в ключевых процессах бактериальной клетки.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>SMC</kwd><kwd>chromosome segregation</kwd><kwd>three-dimensional structure of chromosomes</kwd><kwd>loop extrusion</kwd><kwd>DNA translocase</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>SMC</kwd><kwd>сегрегация ДНК</kwd><kwd>пространственная организация ДНК</kwd><kwd>экструзия петель (loop extrusion)</kwd><kwd>ДНК-транслоказа</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Авторы работы выражают благодарность Побегалову Георгию Евгеньевичу за плодотворное обсуждение рукописи данной работы.</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Alipour E., Marko J.F. 2012. Self-organization of domain structures by DNA-loop-extruding enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res. V. 40. P. 11202.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Arold S.T., Leonard P.G., Parkinson G.N., Ladbury J.E. 2010. H-NS forms a superhelical protein scaffold for DNA condensation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. V. 107. P. 15728.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Bensaid A., Almeida A., Drlica K., Rouviere-Yaniv J. 1996. Cross-talk between topoisomerase I and HU in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. V. 256. P. 292.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Bürmann F., Lee B.G., Than T., Sinn L., O’Reilly F.J., Yatskevich S., Rappsilber J., Hu B., Nasmyth K., Löwe J. 2019. A folded conformation of MukBEF and cohesin. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. V. 26. P. 227.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Cabeen M.T., Jacobs-Wagner C. 2010. The bacterial cytoskeleton. Annu. Rev. Genet. V. 44P. 365.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Chimthanawala A., Parmar J.J., Kumar S., Iyer K.S., Rao M., Badrinarayanan A. 2022. SMC protein RecN drives RecA filament translocation for in vivo homology search. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. V. 119. P. e2209304119.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Dame R.T., Noom M.C., Wuite G.J. 2006. Bacterial chromatin organization by H-NS protein unravelled using dual DNA manipulation. Nature. V. 444. P. 387.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Dame R.T., Rashid F.-Z.M., Grainger D.C. 2020. Chromosome organization in bacteria: mechanistic insights into genome structure and function. Nat. Rev. Genet. V. 21. P. 227.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Danilova O., Reyes-Lamothe R., Pinskaya M., Sherratt D., Possoz C. 2007. MukB colocalizes with the oriC region and is required for organization of the two Escherichia coli chromosome arms into separate cell halves. Mol. Microbiol. V. 65. P. 1485.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Deep A., Gu Y., Gao Y.Q., Ego K.M., Herzik M.A., Jr., Zhou H., Corbett K.D. 2022. The SMC-family Wadjet complex protects bacteria from plasmid transformation by recognition and cleavage of closed-circular DNA. Mol. Cell. V. 82. P. 4145.e7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Diebold-Durand M.L., Lee H., Ruiz Avila L.B., Noh H., Shin H.C., Im H., Bock F.P., Bürmann F., Durand A., Basfeld A., Ham S., Basquin J., Oh B.H., Gruber S. 2017. Structure of full-length SMC and rearrangements required for chromosome organization. Mol. Cell. V. 67. P. 334.e5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Eltsov M., MacLellan K.M., Maeshima K., Frangakis A.S., Dubochet J. 2008. Analysis of cryo-electron microscopy images does not support the existence of 30-nm chromatin fibers in mitotic chromosomes in situ. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. V. 105). P. 19 732.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Ganji M., Shaltiel I.A., Bisht S., Kim E., Kalichava A., Haering C.H., Dekker C. 2018. Real-time imaging of DNA loop extrusion by condensin. Science. V. 360. P. 102.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Georgatos S.D., Markaki Y., Christogianni A., Politou A.S. 2009. Chromatin remodeling during mitosis: a structure-based code? Front. Biosci (Landmark Ed). V. 14. P. 2017.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Gibcus J.H., Samejima K., Goloborodko A., Samejima I., Naumova N., Nuebler J., Kanemaki M.T., Xie L., Paulson J.R., Earnshaw W.C., Mirny L.A., Dekker J. 2018. A pathway for mitotic chromosome formation. Science. V. 359: eaao6135.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Gligoris T.G., Scheinost J.C., Bürmann F., Petela N., Chan K.L., Uluocak P., Beckouët F., Gruber S., Nasmyth K., Löwe J. 2014. Closing the cohesin ring: Structure and function of its Smc3-kleisin interface. Science. V. 346. P. 963.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Gordon B.R., Li Y., Cote A., Weirauch M.T., Ding P., Hughes T.R., Navarre W.W., Xia B., Liu J. 2011. Structural basis for recognition of AT-rich DNA by unrelated xenogeneic silencing proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. V. 108. P. 10 690.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Grainger D.C. 2016. Structure and function of bacterial H-NS protein. Biochem. Soc. Trans. V. 44. P. 1561.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Grove A. 2011. Functional evolution of bacterial histone-like HU proteins. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. V. 13. P. 1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Gruber S., Errington J. 2009. Recruitment of condensin to replication origin regions by ParB/SpoOJ promotes chromosome segregation in B. subtilis. Cell. V. 137. P. 685.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Gruber S., Haering C.H., Nasmyth K. 2003. Chromosomal cohesin forms a ring. Cell. V. 112. P. 765.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Gutierrez-Escribano P., Newton M.D., Llauró A., Huber J., Tanasie L., Davy J., Aly I., Aramayo R., Montoya A., Kramer H., Stigler J., Rueda D. S., Aragon L. 2019. A conserved ATP- and Scc2/4-dependent activity for cohesin in tethering DNA molecules. Sci. Adv. V. 5: eaay6804.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Haering C.H., Farcas A.-M., Arumugam P., Metson J., Nasmyth K. 2008. The cohesin ring concatenates sister DNA molecules. Nature. V. 454. P. 297.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Hancock S.P., Stella S., Cascio D., Johnson R.C. 2016. DNA sequence determinants controlling affinity, stability and shape of DNA complexes bound by the nucleoid protein Fis. PLoS One. V. 11: e0150189.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Hirano T. 2002. The ABCs of SMC proteins: two-armed ATPases for chromosome condensation, cohesion, and repair. Genes Dev. V. 16. P. 399.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Hirota T., Gerlich D., Koch B., Ellenberg J., Peters J.M. 2004. Distinct functions of condensin I and II in mitotic chromosome assembly. J. Cell Sci. V. 117. P. 6435.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Hons M.T., Huis In’t Veld P.J., Kaesler J., Rombaut P., Schleiffer A., Herzog F., Stark H., Peters J. M. 2016. Topology and structure of an engineered human cohesin complex bound to Pds5B. Nat Commun. V. 7P: 12523.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Hutchison C.A., Chuang R.-Y., Noskov V.N., Assad-Garcia N., Deerinck T.J., Ellisman M.H., Gill J., Kannan K., Karas B.J., Ma L., Pelletier J.F., Qi Z.-Q., Richter R.A., Strychalski E.A., Sun L., et al. 2016. Design and synthesis of a minimal bacterial genome. Science. V. 351: aad6253.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Ishiguro K.I. 2019. The cohesin complex in mammalian meiosis. Genes Cells. V. 24. P. 6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Japaridze A., van Wee R., Gogou C., Kerssemakers J.W.J., van den Berg D.F., Dekker C. 2023. MukBEF-dependent chromosomal organization in widened Escherichia coli. Front. Microbiol. V. 14P: 1107093.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Keyamura K., Sakaguchi C., Kubota Y., Niki H., Hishida T. 2013. RecA protein recruits structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC)-like RecN protein to DNA double-strand breaks. J. Biol. Chem. V. 288. P. 29229.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Kim E., Barth R., Dekker C. 2023. Looping the genome with SMC complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. V. 92. P. 15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Kim E., Kerssemakers J., Shaltiel I.A., Haering C.H., Dekker C. 2020. DNA-loop extruding condensin complexes can traverse one another. Nature. V. 579. P. 438.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Lammens A., Schele A., Hopfner K.P. 2004. Structural biochemistry of ATP-driven dimerization and DNA-stimulated activation of SMC ATPases. Curr. Biol. V. 14. P. 1778.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Larionov V.L., Karpova T.S., Kouprina N.Y., Jouravleva G.A. 1985. A mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with impaired maintenance of centromeric plasmids. Curr. Genet. V. 10. P. 15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Lesterlin C., Ball G., Schermelleh L., Sherratt D.J. 2014. RecA bundles mediate homology pairing between distant sisters during DNA break repair. Nature. V. 506. P. 249.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Liu H.W., Roisné-Hamelin F., Beckert B., Li Y., Myasnikov A., Gruber S. 2022. DNA-measuring Wadjet SMC ATPases restrict smaller circular plasmids by DNA cleavage. Mol. Cell. V. 82. P. 4727.e6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Mäkelä J., Sherratt D.J. 2020. Organization of the Escherichia coli chromosome by a MukBEF axial core. Mol. Cell. V. 78. P. 250.e5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>McLean E.K., Lenhart J.S., Simmons L.A. 2021. RecA is required for the assembly of RecN into DNA repair complexes on the nucleoid. J. Bacteriol. V. 203: e0024021.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Minnen A., Attaiech L., Thon M., Gruber S., Veening J.W. 2011. SMC is recruited to oriC by ParB and promotes chromosome segregation in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Mol. Microbiol. V. 81. P. 676.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>Minnen A., Bürmann F., Wilhelm L., Anchimiuk A., Diebold-Durand M.L., Gruber S. 2016. Control of Smc coiled coil architecture by the ATPase heads facilitates targeting to chromosomal ParB/parS and release onto flanking DNA. Cell Rep. V. 14. P. 2003.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>Murayama Y., Samora C.P., Kurokawa Y., Iwasaki H., Uhlmann F. 2018. Establishment of DNA-DNA interactions by the cohesin ring. Cell. V. 172. P. 465.e15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>Nasmyth K. 2001. Disseminating the genome: joining, resolving, and separating sister chromatids during mitosis and meiosis. Annu. Rev. Genet. V. 35. P. 673.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation>Nolivos S., Sherratt D. 2014. The bacterial chromosome: architecture and action of bacterial SMC and SMC-like complexes. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. V. 38. P. 380.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><mixed-citation>Nolivos S., Upton A.L., Badrinarayanan A., Muller J., Zawadzka K., Wiktor J., Gill A., Arciszewska L., Nicolas E., Sherratt D. 2016. MatP regulates the coordinated action of topoisomerase IV and MukBEF in chromosome segregation. Nat. Commun. V. 7: 10466.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><mixed-citation>Olins A.L., Olins D.E. 1974. Spheroid chromatin units (v bodies). Science. V. 183. P. 330.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><mixed-citation>Ou H.D., Phan S., Deerinck T.J., Thor A., Ellisman M.H., O’Shea C.C. 2017. ChromEMT: Visualizing 3D chromatin structure and compaction in interphase and mitotic cells. Science. V. 357: eaag0025.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><mixed-citation>Palecek J.J., Gruber S. 2015. Kite proteins: a superfamily of SMC/Kleisin partners conserved across Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukaryotes. Structure. V. 23. P. 2183.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><mixed-citation>Pellegrino S., Radzimanowski J., de Sanctis D., Boeri Erba E., McSweeney S., Timmins J. 2012. Structural and functional characterization of an SMC-like protein RecN: new insights into double-strand break repair. Structure. V. 20. P. 2076.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><mixed-citation>Petrushenko Z.M., She W., Rybenkov V.V. 2011. A new family of bacterial condensins. Mo. Microbiol. V. 81. P. 881.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><mixed-citation>Pradhan B., Kanno T., Umeda Igarashi M., Loke M.S., Baaske M.D., Wong J.S.K., Jeppsson K., Björkegren C., Kim E. 2023. The Smc5/6 complex is a DNA loop-extruding motor. Nature. V. 616. P. 843.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><mixed-citation>Rice P.A., Yang S., Mizuuchi K., Nash H.A. 1996. Crystal structure of an IHF-DNA complex: a protein-induced DNA U-turn. Cell. V. 87. P. 1295.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B53"><label>53.</label><mixed-citation>Riggs A.D. 1990. DNA methylation and late replication probably aid cell memory, and type I DNA reeling could aid chromosome folding and enhancer function. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. V. 326. P. 285.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B54"><label>54.</label><mixed-citation>Rouvière-Yaniv J., Gros F. 1975. Characterization of a novel, low-molecular-weight DNA-binding protein from Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. V. 72. P. 3428.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B55"><label>55.</label><mixed-citation>Sanborn A.L., Rao S.S., Huang S.C., Durand N.C., Huntley M.H., Jewett A.I., Bochkov I.D., Chinnappan D., Cutkosky A., Li J., Geeting K.P., Gnirke A., Melnikov A., McKenna D., Stamenova E.K., et al. 2015. Chromatin extrusion explains key features of loop and domain formation in wild-type and engineered genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. V. 112. P. E6456.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B56"><label>56.</label><mixed-citation>Sanchez H., Cardenas P.P., Yoshimura S.H., Takeyasu K., Alonso J.C. 2008. Dynamic structures of Bacillus subtilis RecN-DNA complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. V. 36. P. 110.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B57"><label>57.</label><mixed-citation>Schleiffer A., Kaitna S., Maurer-Stroh S., Glotzer M., Nasmyth K., Eisenhaber F. 2003. Kleisins: a superfamily of bacterial and eukaryotic SMC protein partners. Mol. Cell. V. 11. P. 571.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B58"><label>58.</label><mixed-citation>Schneider R., Lurz R., Lüder G., Tolksdorf C., Travers A., Muskhelishvili G. 2001. An architectural role of the Escherichia coli chromatin protein FIS in organising DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. V. 29. P. 5107.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B59"><label>59.</label><mixed-citation>Schwartz M.A., Shapiro L. 2011. An SMC ATPase mutant disrupts chromosome segregation in Caulobacter. Mol. Microbiol. V. 82. P. 1359.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B60"><label>60.</label><mixed-citation>Shintomi K., Inoue F., Watanabe H., Ohsumi K., Ohsugi M., Hirano T. 2017. Mitotic chromosome assembly despite nucleosome depletion in Xenopus egg extracts. Science. V. 356. P. 1284.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B61"><label>61.</label><mixed-citation>Smits W.K., Grossman A.D. 2010. The transcriptional regulator Rok binds A+T-rich DNA and is involved in repression of a mobile genetic element in Bacillus subtilis. PLoS Genet. V. 6: e1001207.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B62"><label>62.</label><mixed-citation>Srinivasan M., Fumasoni M., Petela N.J., Murray A., Nasmyth K.A. 2020. Cohesion is established during DNA replication utilising chromosome associated cohesin rings as well as those loaded de novo onto nascent DNAs. Elife. V. 9: e56611.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B63"><label>63.</label><mixed-citation>Stella S., Cascio D., Johnson R.C. 2010. The shape of the DNA minor groove directs binding by the DNA-bending protein Fis. Genes Dev. V. 24. P. 814.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B64"><label>64.</label><mixed-citation>Stojkova P., Spidlova P., Stulik J. 2019. Nucleoid-associated protein HU: A lilliputian in gene regulation of bacterial nirulence. Fron. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. V. 9: 159.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B65"><label>65.</label><mixed-citation>Strunnikov A.V., Larionov V.L., Koshland D. 1993. SMC1: an essential yeast gene encoding a putative head-rod-tail protein is required for nuclear division and defines a new ubiquitous protein family. J. Cell Biol. V. 123. P. 1635.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B66"><label>66.</label><mixed-citation>Sutani T., Yanagida M. 1997. DNA renaturation activity of the SMC complex implicated in chromosome condensation. Nature. V. 388. P. 798.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B67"><label>67.</label><mixed-citation>Swinger K.K., Rice P.A. 2007. Structure-based analysis of HU-DNA binding. J. Mol. Biol. V. 365. P. 1005.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B68"><label>68.</label><mixed-citation>Tran N.T., Laub M.T., Le T.B.K. 2017. SMC progressively aligns chromosomal arms in Caulobacter crescentus but is antagonized by convergent transcription. Cell Rep. V. 20. P. 2057.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B69"><label>69.</label><mixed-citation>Uranga L.A., Reyes E.D., Patidar P.L., Redman L.N., Lusetti S.L. 2017. The cohesin-like RecN protein stimulates RecA-mediated recombinational repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Nat. Commun. V. 8: 15282.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B70"><label>70.</label><mixed-citation>van Noort J., Verbrugge S., Goosen N., Dekker C., Dame R.T. 2004. Dual architectural roles of HU: formation of flexible hinges and rigid filaments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. V. 101. P. 6969.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B71"><label>71.</label><mixed-citation>Wang X., Brandão H.B., Le T.B., Laub M.T., Rudner D.Z. 2017. Bacillus subtilis SMC complexes juxtapose chromosome arms as they travel from origin to terminus. Science. V. 355. P. 524.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B72"><label>72.</label><mixed-citation>Wang X., Hughes A.C., Brandão H.B., Walker B., Lierz C., Cochran J.C., Oakley M.G., Kruse A.C., Rudner D.Z. 2018. In vivo evidence for ATPase-dependent DNA translocation by the Bacillus subtilis SMC condensin complex. Mol. Cell. V. 71. P. 841.e5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B73"><label>73.</label><mixed-citation>Wang X., Le T.B., Lajoie B.R., Dekker J., Laub M.T., Rudner D.Z. 2015. Condensin promotes the juxtaposition of DNA flanking its loading site in Bacillus subtilis. Genes Dev. V. 29. P. 1661.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B74"><label>74.</label><mixed-citation>Wang X., Tang O.W., Riley E.P., Rudner D.Z. 2014. The SMC condensin complex is required for origin segregation in Bacillus subtilis. Curr. Biol. V. 24. P. 287.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B75"><label>75.</label><mixed-citation>Weiß M., Giacomelli G., Assaya Mathilde B., Grundt F., Haouz A., Peng F., Petrella S., Wehenkel Anne M., Bramkamp M. 2023. The MksG nuclease is the executing part of the bacterial plasmid defense system MksBEFG. Nucleic Acids Res. V. 51. P. 3288.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B76"><label>76.</label><mixed-citation>Wells J.N., Gligoris T.G., Nasmyth K.A., Marsh J.A. 2017. Evolution of condensin and cohesin complexes driven by replacement of Kite by Hawk proteins. Curr. Biol. V. 27. P. R17.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B77"><label>77.</label><mixed-citation>Wiktor J., Gynnå A.H., Leroy P., Larsson J., Coceano G., Testa I., Elf J. 2021. RecA finds homologous DNA by reduced dimensionality search. Nature. V. 597. P. 426.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B78"><label>78.</label><mixed-citation>Wilhelm L., Bürmann F., Minnen A., Shin H.C., Toseland C.P., Oh B.H., Gruber S. 2015. SMC condensin entraps chromosomal DNA by an ATP hydrolysis dependent loading mechanism in Bacillus subtilis. Elife. V. 4: e06659.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B79"><label>79.</label><mixed-citation>Witz G., Stasiak A. 2010. DNA supercoiling and its role in DNA decatenation and unknotting. Nucleic Acids Res. V. 38. P. 2119.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B80"><label>80.</label><mixed-citation>Xu P., Mahamid J., Dombrowski M., Baumeister W., Olins A.L., Olins D.E. 2021. Interphase epichromatin: last refuge for the 30-nm chromatin fiber? Chromosoma. V. 130. P. 91.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B81"><label>81.</label><mixed-citation>Yatskevich S., Rhodes J., Nasmyth K. 2019. Organization of chromosomal DNA by SMC complexes. Annu. Rev. Genet. V. 53. P. 445.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B82"><label>82.</label><mixed-citation>Yoshimura S.H., Hizume K., Murakami A., Sutani T., Takeyasu K., Yanagida M. 2002. Condensin architecture and interaction with DNA: regulatory non-SMC subunits bind to the head of SMC heterodimer. Curr. Biol. V. 12. P. 508.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B83"><label>83.</label><mixed-citation>Yoshinaga M., Inagaki Y. 2021. Ubiquity and origins of structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) proteins in Eukaryotes. Genome Biol. Evol. V. 13: evab256.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B84"><label>84.</label><mixed-citation>Yu W., Herbert S., Graumann P.L., Götz F. 2010. Contribution of SMC (structural maintenance of chromosomes) and SpoIIIE to chromosome segregation in Staphylococci. J. Bacteriol. V. 192. P. 4067.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B85"><label>85.</label><mixed-citation>Zhang N., Kuznetsov S.G., Sharan S.K., Li K., Rao P.H., Pati D. 2008. A handcuff model for the cohesin complex. J. Cell Biol. V. 183. P. 1019.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B86"><label>86.</label><mixed-citation>Zhao H., Bhowmik B.K., Petrushenko Z.M., Rybenkov V.V. 2020. Alternating dynamics of oriC, SMC, and MksBEF in segregation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa chromosome. mSphere. V. 5: e00238-20.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B87"><label>87.</label><mixed-citation>Zhou M. 2022. DNA sliding and loop formation by E. coli SMC complex: MukBEF. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. V. 31: 101 297.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
